You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.
Join our community!
|United 93 Still Airborne After Alleged Crash; Pilots for 911 Truth|
|Topic Started: Apr 28 2009, 11:30 PM (1,542 Views)|
|Domenick DiMaggio||Apr 28 2009, 11:30 PM Post #1|
Pilots for 911 Truth
Edited by Domenick DiMaggio, Apr 28 2009, 11:33 PM.
|swingdangler||Feb 27 2010, 09:02 AM Post #2|
I posted this same question to Woody over at the Pilots thread. So here is the same to you:
This comment is from Marr about UAL 93 is
Marr told Commission staff that his focus was on UAL 93, which was circling
over Chicago. Marr thought UAL 93 was waiting for word over what had been happening
across the country to begin its attack.
-source: 9/11 Comm. Memo
Is this UAL 93:
a. A blip insert.
b. Your second plane, ie. the swap plane.
c. The official plane
The memo is not clear on what time this cause for concern took place. As the story goes, the official plane doesn't leave Cleveland airspace so we can rule out C. We can't confirm or deny A. We know there were blip inserts just not where and exactly when. Could there have been a typo and they meant Cleveland? That is a pretty huge mistake but it would fit within the confines of the OS, however, UAL 93 was not circling over Cleveland it simply turned around. So I think we can rule that out.
Could this be the plane that flew from Chicago airspace and then s/sw through Champagne causing the ACARS to be sent to Ft. Wayne, and then Champagne, Ill? There is no purpose for this route in the event of a swap or within the context of the official story. So I think we can scrap this scenario.
The most likely scenario I can arrive at based upon your new research was that Chicago airspace was the launch point for the swap plane. Marr's group was 'seeing' the swap plane before the exchange took place as described in the memo. He is out of the ops loop and perhaps thinks it might be part of the exercise. The official plane is lost on radar, the swap from Chicago takes place near the Cleveland region in the radar hole Woody has pointed out before, and the official plane after the swap continues to fly s/sw/w resulting in the ACARS to Ft. Wayne, IN, Champagne,IL and then who knows where?
Does any of your research support my interpretation of the UAL 93 that Marr is seeing in above Chicago? If not what do you think Marr and his team were watching circling the skies over Chicago?
Edited by swingdangler, Feb 27 2010, 09:19 AM.
|Domenick DiMaggio||Mar 7 2010, 06:09 PM Post #3|
theres no way for me to help resolve this for you.....i have no way of knowing positively identifying the plane that flew over the crash site so all i could do is offer speculation and i'd rather not engage in so.
once you discover the lie its impossible to determine what is the truth without having direct access to the evidence. the only evidence i've had access to is eyewitnesses and they can't give us a positive id other than to say it was a commercial airliner.
|ihatebush||Nov 25 2012, 11:07 PM Post #4|
I really think we all need to get more people to see this evidence and get a petition going to prosecute the Bush Administation.... Or at the least open up a full investigation of everything that led up to and the events of that tragic day!!
|1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)|
|« Previous Topic · Shanksville · Next Topic »|