| Welcome! You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! |
| Breaking: Fbi Did Not Id 9/11 Plane Wreckage; US Attorney Concedes On Behalf Of FBI | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Mar 15 2008, 10:06 AM (309 Views) | |
| Aidan Monaghan | Mar 15 2008, 10:06 AM Post #1 |
|
The U.S. attorney on behalf of the FBI has revealed to the U.S. district court and myself yesterday, March 14, 2008, that the FBI never formally ID'd the 9/11 planes and do NOT possess ANY records regarding the recovery of the wreckage from the federally registered aircraft they allege were involved in the 9/11 attacks. Assistant U.S. attorney Patrick A. Rose's statement reads: "Since being served with the Summons and Amended Complaint, Federal Defendant, with assistance of its attorneys, has analyzed Plaintiff’s request and conducted a search for responsive records. Federal Defendant has determined that there are no responsive records. The identities of the airplanes hijacked in the September 11 attacks was never in question, and, therefore, there were no records generated “revealing the process by which wreckage recovered by defendant, from aircraft used during the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, was positively identified by defendant . . . as belonging to said aircraft . . .” (Amend Compl. Inj. Relief #15 at 1.)" Case No.: 2:07-cv-01614-RCJ-GWF I'll provide a full update within 48 hours, once I can redact personal address info from the document. Edited by Aidan Monaghan, Mar 15 2008, 10:23 AM.
|
![]() |
|
| JFK | Mar 15 2008, 11:07 AM Post #2 |
![]()
|
Hmmmm.... @ 2:40 So if it isn't the FBI, WHO is it ? USIS ? Or are all the agencies that incompetent ? |
![]() |
|
| 22205 | Mar 15 2008, 12:33 PM Post #3 |
|
Arlingtonian
|
mr.monaghan, im wondering if it is the Justice Dept. and not the FBI who has possession of the evidence from 9/11. recently i ran across the following: http://www.ntsb.gov/Abt_NTSB/invest.htm
am i incorrect in seeing/making a distinction between the FBI vs. the Justice Department? the US attorney works for the Justice Dept., not the FBI, right? perhaps he can shed some light on the evidence and the corresponding government body that had/has jurisdiction over it, namely the Justice Dept., as alleged in the NTSB explanation document. any thoughts? |
![]() |
|
| Aidan Monaghan | Mar 15 2008, 04:38 PM Post #4 |
|
Good question. Based on the following, the FBI seems to be the appropriate agency to produce responsive information: The NTSB factual reports on the 9/11 crashes indicate that the "attacks are under the jurisdiction" of the FBI. From the FBI website: "The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) is the investigative arm of the US Department of Justice." By document labeled "Remarks of Carol Carmody Vice-Chairman, National Transportation Safety Board Leadership in Times of Crisis Seminar", it is indicated that the director of the FBI requested that the NTSB "help identify aircraft parts" belonging to the said aircraft. http://www.ntsb.gov/speeches/carmody/cc020227.htm And by virtue of the U.S. attorneys statement, it seems that a determination was made by the DOJ's investigative agency (the FBI) to not produce records pertaining to aircraft identifications. Plus, to my knowledge, other entities like Judicial Watch sued the FBI for other 9/11 information collected by them. The FBI seems to be the appropriate channel. Edited by Aidan Monaghan, Mar 15 2008, 04:40 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| illeagalhunter | Mar 15 2008, 07:16 PM Post #5 |
|
What do you ally expect when there is a cover up in place. covering in full flow |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · The Lounge · Next Topic » |








7:54 PM Jul 10