A Cessna hit the North Tower?

Welcome!

You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.

Join our community!

A Cessna hit the North Tower?
Topic Started: Mar 31 2009, 03:06 PM (477 Views)
Woody Box	Mar 31 2009, 03:06 PM Post #1
Posts: 120 Group: Members Member #109 Joined: 01/17/08	that if the Cessna's transponder was turned off then he would believe that this Cessna was involved in the terrorist attack on the World Trade Center. #########s advised that he was informed by other tenants in the apartment building that they also observed this Cessna. ########### advised that he will contact ############## with witness contact information. http://911woodybox.blogspot.com/2009/03/cessna-wtc-north-tower-and-missing-page.html
Posts: 120 Group: Members Member #109 Joined: 01/17/08


noeffects	Mar 31 2009, 03:43 PM Post #2
Posts: 798 Group: Members Member #178 Joined: 01/22/08	Quote: Cessna was involved in the terrorist attack on the World Trade Center. does this mean it had to "crash" into WTC 1 ? or was it just seen flying around the area with transponder turned off ? not enough info and have no idea about the whereabouts of "page two" hopefully someone else here can help...
Posts: 798 Group: Members Member #178 Joined: 01/22/08


Woody Box	Mar 31 2009, 03:58 PM Post #3
Posts: 120 Group: Members Member #109 Joined: 01/17/08	noeffects Mar 31 2009, 03:43 PM Quote: Cessna was involved in the terrorist attack on the World Trade Center. does this mean it had to "crash" into WTC 1 ? or was it just seen flying around the area with transponder turned off ? not enough info and have no idea about the whereabouts of "page two" hopefully someone else here can help... You can't see from the ground if a plane has turned off the transponder. Of course the info is thin - that's why I would like to have page 2, and wonder why it's missing. As I understand it, this witness (and some others, too!) have seen the Cessna, and when the North Tower impact occured, he believed it was the Cessna that hit it. Edited by Woody Box, Mar 31 2009, 03:59 PM.
Posts: 120 Group: Members Member #109 Joined: 01/17/08


noeffects	Mar 31 2009, 05:19 PM Post #4
Posts: 798 Group: Members Member #178 Joined: 01/22/08	Quote: You can't see from the ground if a plane has turned off the transponder sorry Woody, i should have worded it a bit different..... How was it known that the transponder on the Cessna was off ?.... Do any other witnesses confirm a "CPT"-(Cessna Plane Theory)?... and also wouldn't a "CPT" have to use a TV Fakery angle ?...
Posts: 798 Group: Members Member #178 Joined: 01/22/08


BoneZ	Mar 31 2009, 06:45 PM Post #5
Posts: 723 Group: Members Member #269 Joined: 02/03/08	I think we all would've seen video by now if a Cessna hit the north tower. I would hope that you're not implying that a Cessna hit in place of a jetliner.
Posts: 723 Group: Members Member #269 Joined: 02/03/08


Woody Box	Apr 1 2009, 02:56 PM Post #6
Posts: 120 Group: Members Member #109 Joined: 01/17/08	noeffects Mar 31 2009, 05:19 PM Quote: You can't see from the ground if a plane has turned off the transponder sorry Woody, i should have worded it a bit different..... How was it known that the transponder on the Cessna was off ?.... Do any other witnesses confirm a "CPT"-(Cessna Plane Theory)?... and also wouldn't a "CPT" have to use a TV Fakery angle ?... My understanding is that the witness observed the Cessna flying low over NYC, and maybe shortly after he lost the sight on it, the North Tower was impacted, so he thought it was the Cessna that hit the tower. I'm speculating here, but this is exactly what I would hope to learn from page 2. I also don't understand the "transponder" remark. The official story (Flight 11 hit the North Tower) was already installed when the witness was interviewed, so maybe he wanted to say: if something was odd with the Cessna, then it must have been part of the attacks. I don't even know if all Cessna's or VFR planes (Visual flight rules) use a transponder. Fact is that the earliest reports on the North Tower impact are talking about a "small plane". Even General Eberhart mentioned that. I don't know - this is for Bonez - what's so wrong with the idea that a small plane hit the tower. Why do you expect video footage? There is rare footage on the first impact, and the quality is so bad that you don't even recognize the size of the plane.
Posts: 120 Group: Members Member #109 Joined: 01/17/08


BoneZ	Apr 1 2009, 04:20 PM Post #7
Posts: 723 Group: Members Member #269 Joined: 02/03/08	Woody Box Apr 1 2009, 02:56 PM what's so wrong with the idea that a small plane hit the tower. Why do you expect video footage? There is rare footage on the first impact, and the quality is so bad that you don't even recognize the size of the plane. Have you tried the Naudet DVD version? It's very clear that the plane is a large jetliner. The second clue to it being a large jetliner is the roaring sound of the jet engines as it passes near the firemen. The third clue is the size of the plane just before impacting the tower. We know the size of the jet and we know the size of the towers and can conclude that it was a large jetliner from the wingspan as it slams into the tower. Lastly, there was a second video of the first impact and watching it again, the object is too large to be a tiny little Cessna. On top of that, the damage to the towers doesn't even come close to being from a Cessna. Two large jetliners hit the towers. The damage to both towers from the jetliners is nearly identical. The hole sizes are nearly identical. Cessna? No possible way. P.S. Woody, don't take any of this personally. I like your work and you're doing a good job.
Posts: 723 Group: Members Member #269 Joined: 02/03/08


Woody Box	Apr 3 2009, 01:42 PM Post #8
Posts: 120 Group: Members Member #109 Joined: 01/17/08	BoneZ Apr 1 2009, 04:20 PM P.S. Woody, don't take any of this personally. I like your work and you're doing a good job. No problem I know the Naudet video, but haven't tried to measure or estimate the size of the plane. To me it looked rather small, but I understand your arguments, and a Cessna might indeed not be the best candidate. Nevertheless, I'm really interested in what this witness said on page 2. The fact that it is missing strikes me suspicious. Maybe there are more positional details, and if the path of this "Cessna" matches what we know from the Naudet video and other sources, it is certainly a good candidate for the North Tower strike. Maybe the witness mistook the plane as a Cessna.
Posts: 120 Group: Members Member #109 Joined: 01/17/08


1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)


« Previous Topic · American Flight 11 · Next Topic »