Shanksville 757 challenge for duhbunkers

Welcome!

You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.

Join our community!

Pages:
1
…
15
16

Shanksville 757 challenge for duhbunkers
Topic Started: Mar 22 2009, 11:12 PM (5,104 Views)
ToS	Sep 18 2009, 02:43 AM Post #376
Posts: 210 Group: Members Member #1,213 Joined: 06/11/09	oquestionador Sep 17 2009, 07:51 PM What about this one? What about it? Flight 1771 (AA11 & AA77. go figure!) crashed over 100mph faster than 93 alleged struck and also hit a dirt field. But guess what? It didn't bury itself. Most of its debris remained above ground. Eerily similar my ass. In fact, the Flight 1771 crash DISPROVES the Flight 93 "crash"! haha
Posts: 210 Group: Members Member #1,213 Joined: 06/11/09


ToS	Sep 18 2009, 02:48 AM Post #377
Posts: 210 Group: Members Member #1,213 Joined: 06/11/09	Hey Alfie, why can't you prove 93 mostly buried? If a large plane like a 757 mostly buried itself, it should be easy to prove, right? What's taking you so long?
Posts: 210 Group: Members Member #1,213 Joined: 06/11/09


oquestionador	Sep 18 2009, 07:17 AM Post #378
Posts: 127 Group: BANNED! Member #1,285 Joined: 08/15/09	What about the wings, tail, landing gear, engines, .... ?
Posts: 127 Group: BANNED! Member #1,285 Joined: 08/15/09


ToS	Sep 18 2009, 02:04 PM Post #379
Posts: 210 Group: Members Member #1,213 Joined: 06/11/09	oquestionador Sep 18 2009, 07:17 AM What about the wings, tail, landing gear, engines, .... ? Yeah, I wonder where all of those are from 93 too!
Posts: 210 Group: Members Member #1,213 Joined: 06/11/09


oquestionador	Sep 18 2009, 02:20 PM Post #380
Posts: 127 Group: BANNED! Member #1,285 Joined: 08/15/09	ToS Sep 18 2009, 02:04 PM oquestionador Sep 18 2009, 07:17 AM What about the wings, tail, landing gear, engines, .... ? Yeah, I wonder where all of those are from 93 too! I support the theory they was reduced into small pieces, but according to the truthers, it doesn't happen with real world air crashes. So, where are all these parts from PSA 1771? It was fake too?
Posts: 127 Group: BANNED! Member #1,285 Joined: 08/15/09


ToS	Sep 18 2009, 02:32 PM Post #381
Posts: 210 Group: Members Member #1,213 Joined: 06/11/09	oquestionador Sep 18 2009, 02:20 PM ToS Sep 18 2009, 02:04 PM oquestionador Sep 18 2009, 07:17 AM What about the wings, tail, landing gear, engines, .... ? Yeah, I wonder where all of those are from 93 too! I support the theory they was reduced into small pieces, but according to the truthers, it doesn't happen with real world air crashes. So, where are all these parts from PSA 1771? It was fake too? I love how you skeptics love to lump all truthers together. Regardless of the size of the pieces, since Flight 1771 hit an open field too, but at a HUNDRED mph faster, according to skeptic logic, shouldn't practically all of 1771 have buried itself, since most of 93 supposedly buried? It looks like hardly any of 1771 buried itself. How's that? Edited by ToS, Sep 18 2009, 02:32 PM.
Posts: 210 Group: Members Member #1,213 Joined: 06/11/09


Toriac	Sep 18 2009, 03:15 PM Post #382
Posts: 116 Group: BANNED! Member #1,292 Joined: 08/19/09	ToS Sep 18 2009, 02:32 PM oquestionador Sep 18 2009, 02:20 PM ToS Sep 18 2009, 02:04 PM oquestionador Sep 18 2009, 07:17 AM What about the wings, tail, landing gear, engines, .... ? Yeah, I wonder where all of those are from 93 too! I support the theory they was reduced into small pieces, but according to the truthers, it doesn't happen with real world air crashes. So, where are all these parts from PSA 1771? It was fake too? I love how you skeptics love to lump all truthers together. Regardless of the size of the pieces, since Flight 1771 hit an open field too, but at a HUNDRED mph faster, according to skeptic logic, shouldn't practically all of 1771 have buried itself, since most of 93 supposedly buried? It looks like hardly any of 1771 buried itself. How's that? I guess all open fields have the same consitency?
Posts: 116 Group: BANNED! Member #1,292 Joined: 08/19/09


ToS	Sep 20 2009, 01:25 PM Post #383
Posts: 210 Group: Members Member #1,213 Joined: 06/11/09	Toriac Sep 18 2009, 03:15 PM ToS Sep 18 2009, 02:32 PM oquestionador Sep 18 2009, 02:20 PM ToS Sep 18 2009, 02:04 PM oquestionador Sep 18 2009, 07:17 AM What about the wings, tail, landing gear, engines, .... ? Yeah, I wonder where all of those are from 93 too! I support the theory they was reduced into small pieces, but according to the truthers, it doesn't happen with real world air crashes. So, where are all these parts from PSA 1771? It was fake too? I love how you skeptics love to lump all truthers together. Regardless of the size of the pieces, since Flight 1771 hit an open field too, but at a HUNDRED mph faster, according to skeptic logic, shouldn't practically all of 1771 have buried itself, since most of 93 supposedly buried? It looks like hardly any of 1771 buried itself. How's that? I guess all open fields have the same consitency? So Shanks was quicksand?! Regardless, why can't you pass the challenge? Too hard or something?
Posts: 210 Group: Members Member #1,213 Joined: 06/11/09


ToS	Sep 27 2009, 01:22 PM Post #384
Posts: 210 Group: Members Member #1,213 Joined: 06/11/09	Skeptics, do you concede defeat on this challenge? You guys haven't past it yet. Do you need a couple of more years? Edited by ToS, Sep 27 2009, 01:23 PM.
Posts: 210 Group: Members Member #1,213 Joined: 06/11/09


ToS	Sep 28 2009, 08:29 PM Post #385
Posts: 210 Group: Members Member #1,213 Joined: 06/11/09	bump for cowards Toriac and Alfie (and any other chicken s*%@ skeptic who can't handle the painful truth.)
Posts: 210 Group: Members Member #1,213 Joined: 06/11/09


ToS	Sep 29 2009, 12:03 PM Post #386
Posts: 210 Group: Members Member #1,213 Joined: 06/11/09	bump for the cowards
Posts: 210 Group: Members Member #1,213 Joined: 06/11/09


ToS	Nov 19 2009, 12:10 AM Post #387
Posts: 210 Group: Members Member #1,213 Joined: 06/11/09	Man, I can't believe the skeptics haven't beat this challenge yet. Your slacking skeptics.
Posts: 210 Group: Members Member #1,213 Joined: 06/11/09


1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)


« Previous Topic · Skeptics · Next Topic »

Pages:
1
…
15
16