| Welcome! You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2
| No Jet Fuel at the Flight 93 Crash Site | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: Mar 4 2009, 10:47 AM (1,564 Views) | |
| NK-44 | Mar 14 2009, 12:02 PM Post #26 |
|
Ok, but I missed the part where you presented an explanation based on evidence to the question where all the jet-fuel had disappeared to. |
![]() |
|
| Lin Kuei | Mar 14 2009, 12:14 PM Post #27 |
![]()
|
Mick you can be confined to the skeptic's section. |
![]() |
|
| NK-44 | Mar 14 2009, 02:54 PM Post #28 |
|
Sorry, LK, I could not find anything skeptical in his posts
|
![]() |
|
| Lin Kuei | Mar 14 2009, 03:04 PM Post #29 |
![]()
|
yeah.. more like the 'systematic, professionally unreasoned denier's section'
|
![]() |
|
| NK-44 | Mar 14 2009, 10:06 PM Post #30 |
|
In this regard, it should be noted that "Most people can smell fuel oil at levels as low as 0.1 parts per million (ppm) in air." For that, it would not be too hard to create effects which people would feel and describe as "really strong" or "overpowering". 9/11 itself delivered the best example to demonstrate that: ![]() This picture was taken by Dom Foulsham from his hotel. Though the towers were hundreds of meters away, he made this statement:
Edited by NK-44, Mar 14 2009, 10:15 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| French St | Mar 15 2009, 10:50 AM Post #31 |
|
See: "Crews Begin Investigation Into Somerset County 757 Crash": http://www.thepittsburghchannel.com/news/956356/detail.html Quote: "We (were) literally surrounded by debris, and there's a very strong odor of scorched earth," Parsons reported. "It doesn't smell like jet fuel, it smells like ... How do you describe it? Burned earth. It smells like burned earth." Italian video"11 settembre 2001 - Inganno Globale vers 3.0" (34 minutes 50 seconds after its beginning): http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8097952875248011643 |
![]() |
|
| decider911 | Mar 15 2009, 07:53 PM Post #32 |
|
jet fuel works in mysterious ways,, sometimes it ignites in fireballs and then waterfalls down 100 floor elevator shafts.. sometimes it evaporates without burning dead grass inches away from staged impact craters.. |
![]() |
|
| swingdangler | Mar 31 2009, 02:32 PM Post #33 |
|
For the skeptic- video of airplane crash high speed into ground. http://www.metacafe.com/watch/913349/show_plane_crash/ A slower speed but you get the point: http://www.metacafe.com/watch/1952312/amazing_plane_crash/ Keep in mind the speed of the plane is really inconsequential compared to the depth of ground penetration with regards to the fuel burn. Seriously, the wings are not going to wait until they penetrate several feet into the ground before exploding, they are going to explode on impact with the ground not impact and then penetration into the ground. Not only does Dom research serve as proof, Jeff Shure from pumpitout.com talked to surrounding residents on the phone and they even claim the photo is fake. Dom and others , have you considered the possibility that the drone or white airplane seen flying around was purposely crashed at Shanksville to serve the cover story? Edited by swingdangler, Mar 31 2009, 02:34 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| SPreston | Mar 31 2009, 04:06 PM Post #34 |
|
Patriotic American
|
There is no sign of jet fuel saturating the soil around this rusty old boneyard engine piece they used for this photo op is there? They expect us to believe that alleged 6 ton RB-211 turbofan engine only buried about a foot underground in soft soil at 563 mph? That rusty old engine gives the appearance or has been staged to look like it is still partially buried just where they found it. Those guys are standing at ground level and there is about a foot of soil above the alleged engine. Of course they could have dug it up from way deeper and then partially buried it again. But why would they have to do that? It looks like it would fit in that backhoe bucket perfectly, doesn't it? Drop it down, nudge it over sideways into the soft soil, dig a little earth out below it, and presto instant photo op for the bad guys. And of course the dry grass and weeds around the alleged hole were untouched by flame or jet fuel. How would the jet fuel allegedly exploding out of the ruptured wing tanks not be expected to splash all over the surrounding vegatation? Perhaps using 20/20 hindsight, the FBI agents should have rented a flame thrower and cleaned up the crime scene. ![]() Official original file photo |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · Investigate 9/11 · Next Topic » |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2









5:09 PM Nov 9