There Was No Missile At the Pentagon

Welcome!

You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.

Join our community!

Pages:
1
2

There Was No Missile At the Pentagon; But the Plane Did Not Hit
Topic Started: Mar 2 2009, 07:04 PM (1,555 Views)
Craig Ranke CIT	Mar 2 2009, 07:04 PM Post #1
Posts: 1,437 Group: Members Member #14 Joined: 01/14/08	There Was No Missile At the Pentagon - But the Plane Did Not Hit (an open letter to the 9/11 truth movement) by: Craig Ranke Citizen Investigation Team www.ThePentaCon.com February 26, 2009 Citizen Investigation Team (CIT) has made it our mission to provide independent verifiable evidence revealing what truly happened at the Pentagon on 9/11/2001. As it turns out we have been extremely successful in obtaining quite a large body of evidence that fatally contradicts the official story specifically proving how the attack jet that flew tree-top level over Arlington timed perfectly with the explosion did not hit the building as reported. Naturally such a scenario proves a complex conspiracy on 9/11 every bit as much as controlled demolition of the World Trade Center. When considering a world-wide psychological black operation on this level we must also consider the counter measures that go along with it. Specifically counter-intelligence efforts otherwise known as disinformation that have been deliberately implemented to throw truth seekers off course. As far as the Pentagon attack is concerned, the evidence we have uncovered reveals beyond a shadow of a doubt that the missile theory was the result of a very calculated, deliberate, and extremely effective counter-intelligence effort. The primary results of this complex effort have been to throw us off course, cause a split in the movement (divide & conquer), and create factions that have launched furious campaigns to accept some sort of a plane impact or else avoid the Pentagon attack all together because it's too "divisive". So in essence it has been wildly successful until CIT came along with a purely skeptical approach and refused all of it while uncovering independent evidence exposing the truth. We refused to accept the official story, we refused to accept all previous theories, and we insisted on physically going to the area to find out what people on the street really saw. We intended on reporting our findings regardless of the results. In addition to contacting as many of the previously published witnesses we could get a hold of we canvassed the neighborhood on foot to find previously unknown witnesses who have never spoken with the media or authorities. No other evidence could possibly be any more independent than first-hand accounts from random witnesses that we could find on the street. As it turned out, time and time again we heard the same story from absolutely everyone we could find. They all saw a very large low flying twin-engine commercial aircraft timed perfectly with a big explosion at the Pentagon. Due to the complex topography and landscape most could not see the alleged impact point of the Pentagon and simply saw the plane and heard or saw the explosion in the distance and therefore assumed the plane must have hit as we were all told by the media and authorities. But absolutely nobody we spoke with saw 2 planes, nobody saw a small plane or drone, and nobody saw anything remotely resembling a missile. Imagine what your impression of the truth movement would be if you were a witness in the neighborhood who saw the plane but later heard about missile conspiracy theories. Those aware of our work understand how we have uncovered that the real smoking gun is the true flight path of the plane which is entirely irreconcilable with all official data, reports, and the physical damage proving the plane people saw did not hit the building. The entire body of evidence we provide is available for free on our website here. So the independent witnesses who were in the critical area right in front of the alleged impact side of the Pentagon all reported a single jet at the time of the attack however in the wrong place to hit the light poles or cause the damage to the building. But nothing at all was reported to have been witnessed on the necessary flight path to cause the physical damage. Because we have been unable to find a single piece of independent evidence for anything on the south side flight path we have logically concluded that the damage to the building was covertly implemented with pre-planted explosives similar to how they brought down the three WTC towers. For years the truth movement has sat back and theorized primarily based off the available images of the event. No comprehensive independent effort to talk with the witnesses first-hand (and provide recorded accounts) had been undertaken by the media, authorities, or the official story skeptics. People have been aware of a cover-up when considering the confiscation of all the surrounding security video tapes and they have longed for a release of this information despite the fact that it has been completely controlled by the suspect and therefore subject to manipulation. Many have considered rumors that certain unnamed alleged hotel employees had supposedly watched one of the tapes "in horror". People have hoped that these alleged individuals would reveal the truth if they could be found. For years the movement has demanded a release of these government controlled videos and lamented about getting a hold of these supposed hotel employees to find out what they saw. CIT did much better than that by providing first-hand, on-location, video-taped interviews from actual witnesses to the event in real life! Not merely people who supposedly saw a grainy security video. So now we know what people really saw. Now we know there was a plane and we know that it could not have hit the building. This is exactly what we needed to end the speculation. The witnesses were there and their stories match! They saw what happened and they prove a deception. We removed the need for guess-work, speculation, and theorizing. We went right to the source and reported it direct for you. There isn't a reason on earth for any logical skeptic to reject definitive corroborated first-hand witness accounts proving the official story false. So why has the truth movement for the most part insisted on continuing with speculation about missiles and/or remote guided 757 impact theories to counter the missile theories? Because the counter-intelligence operation worked exactly as intended. Obviously this endless debate about a false claim has served their purposes perfectly causing people to chase their tails while over-looking the hard evidence that has been uncovered in the mean time. This situation already had most people frustrated with the Pentagon attack to the point that many had abandoned researching it all together before CIT even existed. Or else it has made people who are firmly in the missile camp reluctant to entertain anything that doesn't prove a missile. The psychological operation runs so deep that some in the movement have actually chosen to attack CIT personally instead of accepting the fact that the witnesses we spoke with prove a deception. We refused to be dismissive or dogmatic and it led to the incredible amount of evidence we have obtained revealing an outcome that most didn't expect. As a result we have been forced to overcome this already convoluted and very heated debate just to get people to even look at the definitive evidence that we provide. The reality is that there is an equal amount of independent evidence for a missile as there is for a 757 impact. Zero. Considering all that we have uncovered it's clear to us how effective this missile theory counter-intelligence effort has been. Think about the source. The missile was first mentioned by Donald Rumsfeld himself in what was written off as a slip of the tongue but then it was made famous by French conspiracy author Thierry Meyssan within the first months after the event. But the most effective catalyst for this disinformation came in early 2002 with the unofficial leak of the blatantly doctored 5 frames from the Pentagon security gate camera. This incredibly effective psychological manipulation tool has been the single most over-analyzed piece of invalid government supplied "evidence" to date. It has caused the movement to be fixated on what could be discerned from the grainy ambiguous video frames as allegedly "hitting the building" while completely diverting us from the true smoking gun - the actual flight path of the plane. From then on the missile theory phenomenon took on a life of its own as the entire notion of a missile attack on the Pentagon pretty much defined the early stages of the truth movement. Naturally an eventual revolt within the movement itself would be easily predicted setting the stage for us to emerge divided. As it stands, we are headed towards the 8th anniversary of the attack and there still remains absolutely zero independent evidence for a missile and discussing the Pentagon attack at all is considered taboo in some corners. The missile theory has remained popular and the divisiveness it has nurtured caused many to shy away from the hard evidence CIT presents proving a deception in a much different way. Consider this a plea. We are asking you to remove yourself from your previous biases and look at this situation objectively. Familiarize yourself with the full body of information we provide and accept nothing less than 100% independent verifiable evidence moving forward. The 9/11 operation can no longer be considered a conspiracy theory so we should not reduce it to such by continuing to focus on speculation over evidence. Nothing that has been controlled and provided for by the government can fairly be accepted as valid evidence in any way shape or form. They aren't going to hand us a video tape proving what really happened and they certainly didn't do this when they deliberately leaked the doctored 5 frames in 2002. Obviously this was part of the plan. It's imperative that we abandon speculation in light of the fact that we most certainly do have hard evidence proving a deception. CIT will be providing an additional free resource very soon to help everyone get the most pertinent information to the media and authorities in an efficient and professional package so stay tuned for that. Please help us hyper-focus on the information that reveals this heinous crime as opposed to concentrating on distractions that cause the simple notion of 9/11 being an inside job to remain in the category of "outrageous conspiracy theories" for the masses. The north side approach is real. It has been proven. It can not be neutralized or spun. No speculation required. We have provided the evidence but we can only do so much. We need your help bringing it to light. Thanks and peace.
Posts: 1,437 Group: Members Member #14 Joined: 01/14/08


noeffects	Mar 2 2009, 11:43 PM Post #2
Posts: 798 Group: Members Member #178 Joined: 01/22/08	bump ...good post Craig. new "package"?....DVD and whatnots? getting NOC witnesses, lightpoles, cameras, Lloyd E.,taxi, ....all in a quick movie....can it be done for the ADHD ?
Posts: 798 Group: Members Member #178 Joined: 01/22/08


Craig Ranke CIT	Mar 2 2009, 11:55 PM Post #3
Posts: 1,437 Group: Members Member #14 Joined: 01/14/08	noeffects Mar 2 2009, 11:43 PM getting NOC witnesses, lightpoles, cameras, Lloyd E.,taxi, ....all in a quick movie....can it be done for the ADHD ? That's the plan! A no nonsense piece with the most hard-hitting parts all broken down concisely. No music or verbal narration. Something you can send to your politicians and local media outlets.
Posts: 1,437 Group: Members Member #14 Joined: 01/14/08


Bitterman	Mar 3 2009, 03:41 AM Post #4
Posts: 324 Group: Members Member #284 Joined: 02/07/08	Fantastic. I've been out of the loop lately, but it seems like a good time to get right back into the saddle and start getting this out more. 2009 will be a good year for this.
Posts: 324 Group: Members Member #284 Joined: 02/07/08


noeffects	Mar 3 2009, 08:40 AM Post #5
Posts: 798 Group: Members Member #178 Joined: 01/22/08	thanks Craig, any clue as to the ETA or name of release?
Posts: 798 Group: Members Member #178 Joined: 01/22/08


Craig Ranke CIT	Mar 3 2009, 01:59 PM Post #6
Posts: 1,437 Group: Members Member #14 Joined: 01/14/08	noeffects Mar 3 2009, 08:40 AM thanks Craig, any clue as to the ETA or name of release? mmmm give me at least 30 days.
Posts: 1,437 Group: Members Member #14 Joined: 01/14/08


JackD	Mar 3 2009, 07:50 PM Post #7
Posts: 260 Group: Members Member #253 Joined: 01/31/08	why has WTC demolitions guy Jim Hoffman, who has been really supportive of AE911Truth & gang, such a plane-striker over the Pentagon? seems odd.
Posts: 260 Group: Members Member #253 Joined: 01/31/08


Aldo Marquis CIT	Mar 3 2009, 08:12 PM Post #8
Posts: 1,642 Group: Members Member #13 Joined: 01/14/08	JackD Mar 3 2009, 07:50 PM seems odd. Seems operational to me.
Posts: 1,642 Group: Members Member #13 Joined: 01/14/08


JackD	Mar 4 2009, 01:39 PM Post #9
Posts: 260 Group: Members Member #253 Joined: 01/31/08	I could understand Jim Hoffman's worries in 2002 or 2003, that the Pentagon situation might be set up as a 'honey pot' and eventually be used to discredit the truth movement as a whole. However, in light of the 2005-2009 'new data' -- it is hard to defend that sort of worry anymore. jim did good work analyzing WTC data. someone should send him PentaCon data.
Posts: 260 Group: Members Member #253 Joined: 01/31/08


MIHOP	Mar 4 2009, 02:20 PM Post #10
Posts: 4 Group: Members Member #917 Joined: 11/02/08	JackD Mar 4 2009, 01:39 PM I could understand Jim Hoffman's worries in 2002 or 2003, that the Pentagon situation might be set up as a 'honey pot' and eventually be used to discredit the truth movement as a whole. However, in light of the 2005-2009 'new data' -- it is hard to defend that sort of worry anymore. jim did good work analyzing WTC data. someone should send him PentaCon data. He already knows about CIT's work. He calls The PentaCon a "hoax-promoting" video and refuses to defend that characterization. http://www.911review.com/disinfo/videos.html Here he calls NOC/flyover a "No-Plane Theory" and implies that it is not supported by "real evidence": http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/911mysteries/911weknow.html http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/media/nptimeline.html Here he promotes Arabesque's disinfo "rebuttal" to The PentaCon (he promotes it on the "hoax" page as well): http://911research.wtc7.net/resources/web/pentagon.html See Crag's Rebuttal to that dishonest hitpiece here: http://z3.invisionfree.com/CIT/index.php?showtopic=48&st=0& CIT has challenged Hoffman to a debate and he refuses to even respond: http://z3.invisionfree.com/CIT/index.php?showtopic=32 Multiple other non-CIT people have e-mailed Hoffman and asked him to either explain trying to marginalize their work or stop doing it, and he refuses to respond. See first and third posts here by Ligon and mreed: http://z3.invisionfree.com/CIT/index.php?showtopic=508&st=30 These are not the actions of a fellow truth seeker. Edited by MIHOP, Mar 4 2009, 02:24 PM.
Posts: 4 Group: Members Member #917 Joined: 11/02/08


Bitterman	Mar 5 2009, 02:01 AM Post #11
Posts: 324 Group: Members Member #284 Joined: 02/07/08	Thanks MIHOP. Welcome!
Posts: 324 Group: Members Member #284 Joined: 02/07/08


MIHOP	Mar 5 2009, 02:34 AM Post #12
Posts: 4 Group: Members Member #917 Joined: 11/02/08	Bitterman Mar 5 2009, 02:01 AM Thanks MIHOP. Welcome!
Posts: 4 Group: Members Member #917 Joined: 11/02/08


UKperspective	Mar 8 2009, 09:41 AM Post #13
Posts: 63 Group: Members Member #177 Joined: 01/22/08	Great Post Craig. I know how hard you have been working and I am looking forward to your new Movie..
Posts: 63 Group: Members Member #177 Joined: 01/22/08


Craig Ranke CIT	Mar 10 2009, 09:30 AM Post #14
Posts: 1,437 Group: Members Member #14 Joined: 01/14/08	UKperspective Mar 8 2009, 09:41 AM Great Post Craig. I know how hard you have been working and I am looking forward to your new Movie.. Thanks UKP. But I wouldn't call this next piece a "movie". More like hard evidence in a format that anybody can be take to the authorities and media. That includes people in the UK and throughout the world. We're going to provide free downloads so you can burn DVD's and we are going to lay out a strategy with additional tools making it easy for people to take action.
Posts: 1,437 Group: Members Member #14 Joined: 01/14/08


A.L.Ex - N.E.T.A	Mar 20 2009, 09:13 AM Post #15
Posts: 45 Group: Members Member #854 Joined: 09/16/08	"... absolutely nobody we spoke with saw 2 planes" that doesn't mean there were NOT two planes in the area, there was ... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dcat-y0p9zo "nobody saw a small plane or drone" at least that's what they may THINK, a drone could be painted up to look like an American Airlines plane therefore explaining people sying the saw one and those skinny scraps of colored materials on the Pentagon lawn (FOR THE RECORD this is NOT my opinion however) "and nobody saw anything remotely resembling a missile. the missle would be set off as close to the building as possible and travel at a speed too quick for any one to really even notice it, especially if there's a huge plane in the area grabbing everyones attention Edited by A.L.Ex - N.E.T.A, Mar 20 2009, 09:14 AM.
Posts: 45 Group: Members Member #854 Joined: 09/16/08


Craig Ranke CIT	Mar 20 2009, 12:10 PM Post #16
Posts: 1,437 Group: Members Member #14 Joined: 01/14/08	A.L.Ex - N.E.T.A Mar 20 2009, 09:13 AM "... absolutely nobody we spoke with saw 2 planes" that doesn't mean there were NOT two planes in the area, there was ... Yes I am aware that there was a 2nd plane, specifically a C-130 flown by Lt. Col Steve O'Brien. I have personally interviewed MANY witnesses who saw it and we have had dialog with the pilot direct. The evidence proves he was not there until about 3 minutes after the explosion. The presence of this plane 3 minutes later has been used in the propaganda (like the anonymous govt provided "witness" interview you linked) as cover for the flyover to blend it with the completely false notion that it was in the area at the same time as the explosion. Please see our 37 minute short The 2nd Plane Cover Story for details and evidence breaking this all down for you. Quote: "nobody saw a small plane or drone" at least that's what they may THINK, a drone could be painted up to look like an American Airlines plane therefore explaining people sying the saw one and those skinny scraps of colored materials on the Pentagon lawn (FOR THE RECORD this is NOT my opinion however) This is an old debunked conspiracy theory. We provide too much evidence to the contrary. I highly recommend you view the massive body of evidence we present before coming to a conclusion. All of our presentations are available here: http://www.thepentacon.com/videoshorts.htm Just start from the bottom and work your way up chronologically. Quote: "and nobody saw anything remotely resembling a missile. the missle would be set off as close to the building as possible and travel at a speed too quick for any one to really even notice it, especially if there's a huge plane in the area grabbing everyones attention Missiles are very noticeable. There is zero evidence for a missile and this type of speculation with no evidence to back it up is a big distraction from the hard evidence that we DO have proving a deception. That's the point of the article. Focus on evidence, not speculation. Please view everything we present in full before coming to a conclusion. That's all we ask. Thanks! Edited by Craig Ranke CIT, Mar 20 2009, 02:11 PM.
Posts: 1,437 Group: Members Member #14 Joined: 01/14/08


Flippy	Mar 20 2009, 01:38 PM Post #17
Posts: 574 Group: Members Member #8 Joined: 01/12/08	Quote: We're going to provide free downloads so you can burn DVD's and we are going to lay out a strategy with additional tools making it easy for people to take action. I've said it before. Thank you CIT Crew! You are the true seekers of truth.
Posts: 574 Group: Members Member #8 Joined: 01/12/08


Craig Ranke CIT	Mar 20 2009, 05:08 PM Post #18
Posts: 1,437 Group: Members Member #14 Joined: 01/14/08	Flippy Mar 20 2009, 01:38 PM Quote: We're going to provide free downloads so you can burn DVD's and we are going to lay out a strategy with additional tools making it easy for people to take action. I've said it before. Thank you CIT Crew! You are the true seekers of truth. You bet Flippy. Thank YOU for the support and for helping us force accountability for this conclusive evidence while exposing the traitors who dedicate their lives to covering up mass murder.
Posts: 1,437 Group: Members Member #14 Joined: 01/14/08


A.L.Ex - N.E.T.A	Mar 24 2009, 11:22 AM Post #19
Posts: 45 Group: Members Member #854 Joined: 09/16/08	Sorry but how can you say there is NO evidence of a missle when whatever hit made it so far into the Pentagon? Something pierced those concrete rings and I can't think of anything but a missle that could do it. And with the size of drone being larger than small private planes, and the fact that they carry missles and bombs, how can you say that the idea of a painted drone is nothing but conspiracy theory? Debunked? Where? (I watched your doc months back so if you wish to point to this please can you give me a rough time to jump to?) Thank you
Posts: 45 Group: Members Member #854 Joined: 09/16/08


Craig Ranke CIT	Mar 24 2009, 01:44 PM Post #20
Posts: 1,437 Group: Members Member #14 Joined: 01/14/08	A.L.Ex - N.E.T.A Mar 24 2009, 11:22 AM Sorry but how can you say there is NO evidence of a missle when whatever hit made it so far into the Pentagon? Something pierced those concrete rings and I can't think of anything but a missle that could do it. The rings are not divided in the bottom two levels so your speculation is based on a completely false assumption. But either way, speculation is not evidence. Quote: And with the size of drone being larger than small private planes, and the fact that they carry missles and bombs, how can you say that the idea of a painted drone is nothing but conspiracy theory? Debunked? Where? (I watched your doc months back so if you wish to point to this please can you give me a rough time to jump to?) There is no evidence for a small plane of any sort and we have released many follow up presentations so please view ALL of the evidence before passing judgment. Particularly parts 1 & 2 of The North Side Flyover as well as The Eye of the Storm.
Posts: 1,437 Group: Members Member #14 Joined: 01/14/08


Domenick DiMaggio	Mar 26 2009, 05:26 AM Post #21
Posts: 1,966 Group: Members Member #22 Joined: 01/14/08	A.L.Ex - N.E.T.A Mar 24 2009, 11:22 AM Sorry but how can you say there is NO evidence of a missle when whatever hit made it so far into the Pentagon? Something pierced those concrete rings and I can't think of anything but a missle that could do it. perhaps this can help you 'think' of some other options?
Posts: 1,966 Group: Members Member #22 Joined: 01/14/08


noeffects	Mar 26 2009, 08:34 AM Post #22
Posts: 798 Group: Members Member #178 Joined: 01/22/08	When i think of a certain section of the Pentagram being "renovated" i think... what a nice convenient thing we have here...if im not mistaken...they had all the parameters to make any style of explosion...think... they have the resources. Quote: "There was a bomb thanks to AMEC's sabotage and vulnerability testing at Wedge one of the Pentagon. AMEC was responsible for Wedge one renovation pre 911, cleanup after the drone hit on 911 and rebuilding Wedge one post 911" Utuber succulentsnatch (pfft) Im not about the "drone" but is this true about AMEC ?
Posts: 798 Group: Members Member #178 Joined: 01/22/08


Craig Ranke CIT	Mar 26 2009, 10:51 AM Post #23
Posts: 1,437 Group: Members Member #14 Joined: 01/14/08	noeffects Mar 26 2009, 08:34 AM Im not about the "drone" but is this true about AMEC ? What, that they planted "a bomb"? Obviously somebody had to but whomever you are quoting seems to be conspiracy theorizing if you ask me.
Posts: 1,437 Group: Members Member #14 Joined: 01/14/08


JackD	Mar 26 2009, 06:32 PM Post #24
Posts: 260 Group: Members Member #253 Joined: 01/31/08	observation 1) there was a cone-shaped pattern of damage in wedge one that occured on 9/11/01., extending from Ring E inward to Ring D and ring C. observation 2) post-9/11 computer simulations of a plane impact 'informed us' that a plane would cause a cone shaped damage pattern consistent with what was observed -- Purdue University 'recreated' a simulation of plane-into-Pentagon 'after' the fact obs 3) there is little physical evidence of a plane impact, in terms of identificable AA77 marked parts, debris, luggage, seats, letters, etc -- despite the fact that a plane was observed in the area. obs 4) there is little or NO physical evidence of a missile of any type striking Pentagon obs 5) the immediate reaction of Pentagon survivors was that bombs had gone off -- shockwaves, cordite smell, blast, location. How do you create a "plane like" damage pattern in Pentagon without an actual plane impact? Easy -- you SIMULATE it first, then engineer and place the the incendiary bombs, second. How do you place bombs in a secure facility like the Pentagon? Do it during wedge one Renovation, when the area is highly secured, and empty of regular personnel. Who renovated Wedge One? AMEC and other corporations. I think you are not terribly far from a plausible scenario. No one doubts that there was a plane flying NEAR the Pentagon on 9/11/01. But the CAUSE of the damage seems to be carefullly placed incendiary explosives that MIMICKED to a high degree what a later Purdue simulation would re-create as a plane strike, which could be endlessly replayed to show us just how it 'happened' CIT is on the right path. As for who the murderers are, you'll need to subpoena the contractors who worked on Wedge One during renovation up to 9/11/01 AM. Note that the renovation was scheduld to be complete by 9/10/01.
Posts: 260 Group: Members Member #253 Joined: 01/31/08


noeffects	Mar 27 2009, 05:59 PM Post #25
Posts: 798 Group: Members Member #178 Joined: 01/22/08	so AMEC hired ACM to do clean-up... AMC's Pentagon 9/11 page.Pentagon 9/11/01 > Home > Recent Projects/Clients On September 11, 2001 immediately after hijacked American Airlines Flight 77 struck the Pentagon, the Pentagon Renovation Team (Pen-Ren) and AMEC the defense contractor turned their full attention to supporting rescue efforts, making the area safe, and the reconstruction of the aircraft impact site. To help make this happen, Pen-Ren and AMEC turned to ACM Services, Incorporated. Beginning the afternoon of 9-11 and for the next 98 days, ACM Services' Hazmat and demolition team lead the charge by removing hazardous materials, testing, cleaning and making the way safe for occupants, workers and for the reconstruction of Pentagon Wedge I and II, The Phoenix Project. Here are some of the tasks we completed: Provided around the clock supervision, manpower, equipment and supplies to address and abate all environmental issues. Established control areas encompassing over 1 million square feet of building space to limit the spread of mold and airborne asbestos. Constructed approximately 34,800 square feet of hard barrier and safety walls. Transported 5,072 loads of debris traveling over 600,000 road miles to a secure landfill to deposit nearly 49,000 tons of material. Removed asbestos from and demolished 1 million square feet of building space with mold contaminated drywall, carpet, furnishings and ceiling tile. Managed and directed more than 590 hazmat laborers, Project Managers and superintendents. Fine cleaned to remove soot and smoke from 350,000 square feet of building area. Provided personnel protective equipment including approximately 18,150 disposable “bunny” suits, 3,655 respirators and 18,766 respirator filters to rescue workers, government and military personnel. ... all in 98 days!
Posts: 798 Group: Members Member #178 Joined: 01/22/08


1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)


Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · Pentagon · Next Topic »

Pages:
1
2