| Welcome! You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! |
| Sgt Lagasse Stands By Placement of the Plane; After Seeing The PentaCon | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: Feb 27 2009, 04:38 PM (3,414 Views) | |
| Scooter | Jul 27 2009, 07:09 AM Post #201 |
|
Allow me to ask a simple question which hopefully has just as simple of an answer. If the plane really did fly over the building as you suggested, wouldn't someone on the other side of the building have seen that? |
 |
 
|
| Domenick DiMaggio | Jul 27 2009, 07:18 AM Post #202 |
|
let me ask you a simple question : if after 2 planes struck the world trade center a report came out that a plane hit the pentagon why would anyone in the media talk to someone who saw a plane that "obviously" didn't hit the pentagon? wouldn't the general consensus have been that they saw a different plane since everyone knows that a plane hit the pentagon? do you really expect there to be scores and scores of witnesses documented by the corporate media to seeing a low flying plane which "obviously" isn't the plane that hit the building? |
|
|
|
| Scooter | Jul 27 2009, 06:42 PM Post #203 |
|
Well, why wouldn't they? On the biggest news day in the modern history of news days, why wouldn't a single person in the media want to gather such information? If these people have been ignored, why hasn't the Citizen Investigation Team found them and put them in their video? There are potentially THOUSANDS of people who could have seen a plane fly DIRECTLY over the Pentagon after the explosion. It would have to have been flying extremely low to be covered up in an illusion where an explosion takes place and the plane flies through it. It would have been a few hundred feet above the air, and people would have seen it, have HEARD it, and most definitely have remembered it. I don't think the Citizen Investigation Team has any idea how devastating this simple fact is to their research. The simple fact that they can't produce one person out of potentially thousands of people who could have seen the plane fly over. Also, if they didn't talk on 9/11, they've had 8 years to come forward to whoever they want. You can't make an argument that they've all been quieted by the government or whoever was responsible for this conspiracy...do you know how huge of a radius of people there would be on the other side of the Pentagon? How could they hope to find everyone who witnessed the event? And none of this even comes close to explaining an even more simple question: why would you fake the illusion of crashing a plane into the Pentagon when you could have much more easily just crashed the thing into the building?
If I gave you the benefit of the doubt, that would still only be a "general" consensus, not a complete 100% consensus. Find just one person who wasn't part of the "general" consensus and put him in The PentaCon.
Scores and scores? Not necessarily. At least one? Well if the theory proposed in the PentaCon is true, then the answer is an absolute yes. Edited by Scooter, Jul 27 2009, 06:45 PM.
|
|
|
|
| Domenick DiMaggio | Jul 28 2009, 02:35 AM Post #204 |
|
because they believed a plane hit the building. just like you do. so why would they want to talk to people who saw a plane that didn't hit the building?
well its kind of hard finding out who was near the pentagon or on the opposite side of the impact at roughly 9:40am on 9/11 without people who were there actually documenting them in someway. you are asking the impossible and i know you realize how impossible it is which is why you require such proof. and if cit found 5 more flyover witnesses you would find ways to dismiss them just like you have to officer roberts.
there are potentially THOUSANDS of people who could have seen the plane ripping light poles out of the ground and impale a taxi and yet there isn't one single documented witness to this event taking place. your theory of potentially thousands of witnesses itself is a strawman as we have no idea how many people could be in the vacinity at any given time.
i don't believe a plane flew through the explosion as this seems like it would be very risky and extremely dangerous. perhaps relatively close or past the impact spot at the time of the explosion seems more logical.
yeah they did. they were told it was a different plane. you fail to grasp this explanation though.
they have but you act like he doesn't exist.
yeah? if you saw it who would you contact?
no one is making that argument.
less risks. less chance of failure.
well officer roberts saw the flyover and the 14 other witnesses in national security alert place the plane in a place that makes impact impossible and proves that the silver commercial airliner he saw over the south parking lot banking away has to be the same plane the witnesses saw approaching the pentagon in a bank. how can you not grasp this?
2 paragraphs up you said "thousands". now you want at least one. officer roberts is at least one but you dismiss him. is this scootle from prison planet? |
|
|
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · Skeptics · Next Topic » |
8:21 AM Nov 23
