Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Welcome!

You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.

Join our community!

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
Nobody talks about Mad 3/11 and Lon 7/7?; If 9/11 is a lie, what are they? conex?
Topic Started: Mar 2 2008, 12:52 PM (133 Views)
manolain

I am from Spain, and I just arrived from a touristic visit from New York. I obviously visited Ground Zero, and was shocked to see all those places that we all watched that day live, where so many people died in the worst day of History.

As soon as I got back home, I watched Loose Change, that I had been "reservarting" until this day.

First of all, I must admit that even in the same day of the 9/11 attacks everything sounded strange to me. An airplane crashes in the Pentagon and no remains are found??????

But then came here in Spain attacks over trains that killed 200 people. And then the attacks over London underground (46 killed).

And I ask....if the attacks over New York on Sept 11th were commited by the Bush administration and closers, to get a "blank" checks for their deccissions and politics....did they also organise these attacks?

In Spain, the attacks took place exactly three days before the general elections, and made the results to change: conservator party, who was already ruling, and the one who decided to go over Irak war, and support USA on this decission, when a lot of people was against that, and a lot of manifestations took place, was first on all surveys and polls, by far
Lots of people changed their vote after this, and the other big party in the country won, and one of their first acts was to stop supporting war on Irak, so it does not make any sense that Bush admin planned this attack.

I would like to share all this with you, and receive your comments and opinions. Thanks a lot!!!

Sorry for English
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Agent

"Nobody talks about"

you been living under a rock?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
alexvegas
Member Avatar
alex25smash
People talk about both. A lot.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Shagata Ganai
Member Avatar
Multiple Criminal Theorist
Check out the old forum. There is a lot of info stored there. And, after all, this forum IS titled Loose Change 9/11, not Madrid trains 3/11 or London transport 7/7. ;)


Edit: BTW, your English is great!
Edited by Shagata Ganai, Mar 2 2008, 02:35 PM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
istherehope

Hi Manolain. you bring up a good point, but you have overlooked something.
there were also suspicious bombings in Bali, and Russia, along with older ones like oklahoma and earlier wtc bombing, along with the same "problem reaction solution" tactic and a very similar MO used in school shootings, massacres and all sorts of other events. over the years (even pearl harbour and older events.)

this is not a local thing. I suggest you look at the policies brought in by the new government, I would hazard a guess that the "solution" the event was after was 1984 style big brother police state "anti terror" laws, like the US "patriot act". now whether or not they were successful depends on how gullible spanish people are and how well they control opinion there...

think of it this way: Imagine there is this worldwide illuminati group trying to bring in world government and control. Now lets imagine just for arguments sake they have almost complete control of the political process and even the media (I do not know if this is true though I think so), among other things. They still cannot just implement world gov 1984 style overnight, because the sheeple would wake up to such an overt use of control on what should be a free system. So what they do is they give us 'democracy, and allow us to 'choose between 2 or 3 candidates/parties so we think we have some say in what goes on, not realising that ALL the leadership options we get presented with by the media are puppets who will just bring about the goal in different manners, like 2 lumberjacks cutting down a tree from different sides: some examples:

here in australia we just got rid of a long standing liberal party government which had been supporting the wars in iraq/afganistan etc and bringing in all sorts of freedom destroying "anti terrorism" laws. Now we have the labour party in power, and one of the first things they did is try to censor the internet.... obviously their intentions are to "protect the children".... (sarcasm). so we have two supposedly unrelated parties attacking our freedom from different angles, all the while having superficial differences (such as workplace relations policies) that make no real difference, and neither of them changing any of the ridiculously corrupt practices that are ruining this country (and many others) such as our privately owned "reserve bank of Australia', which, in the same way as the American federal reserve, effectively creates money out of nothing, loans it to the government/people, and charges enormous interest for this completely useless act that the government itself could, has in the past, and should be doing. (look up a movie called 'the money masters" for more info on this, try google video)

another example of so called democratic choice was between bush jr and john kerry in America. Now while the american election process now appears to be rigged anyway (diebold etc) that in itself is almost a non issue, because look at the options people were given by the media: Two men, cousins to each other, both related to English/European royalty (as has been pretty much every US president in history), both went to Yale to be brainwashed into the right elitist mentality (of course this was just the finishing touches to something that had started when they were born) BOTH IN THE SAME TINY SECRET SOCIETY "Skull and Bones" that only has a few members per year, and who swear loyalty to each other above all other oaths (eg the one presidents take to america on assuming office). What is the probability that this (and other similar election "choices" americans have had) is pure chance? Well just going on the skull and bones thing alone, about 1 in a million (assuming roughly 200 US members, a generous guess).

It helps if you think of what "they" are doing as a game: How can we get our 1984 dream in the fastest manner without waking up the sheeple, kind of like boiling a frog alive by putting it in cold water and heating it, rather than dropping it straight in the boiling water where it will hop straight out.

i think "their' biggest limitation is the sheeple awareness factor (and they probably use websites like this to track how many of us are even slightly aware of whats going on), so they probably like to take 2 or three steps forward and 1 step back, just so sheeple think they have a hope of fighting these changes they dont like in a "legal" peaceful manner and dont all just rebel and overthrow the fuckers in an instant.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
ZetaBoards - Free Forum Hosting
Enjoy forums? Start your own community for free.
Learn More · Sign-up Now
« Previous Topic · The Lounge · Next Topic »
Add Reply