Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Welcome!

You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.

Join our community!

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
#1 Reason not to vote for Osama Obama
Topic Started: Feb 28 2008, 05:07 PM (548 Views)
Domenick DiMaggio

Is right here

Now who wants to argue about it?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Roxdog
Member Avatar

I'll play devil's advocate. Is he an actual member?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Domenick DiMaggio

Of course he is. Just like Clinton & McCain.....

Remember 2004 Skull & Bones vs. Skull & Bones?

The win/win situation where the only loser was the American people and the options were to (a)stay the course and (b)stay the course but do it smarter. Same thing.

Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
arbor
Member Avatar

FYI..the only reason Neo-Cons call Barak Obama "Osama" and "Barak HUSSEIN Obama" is they are trying to confuse people into thinking he is a crypto-Muslim, will be weak on terrorism, or even worse, will be supportive of Muslim extremist terrorism.

Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Sureshot
Member Avatar
Your glorious Loose Change Forum dictator...
His wife is a member:
http://www.thechicagocouncil.org/chicago_council_board_directors.php
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Domenick DiMaggio

arbor
Feb 28 2008, 06:52 PM
FYI..the only reason Neo-Cons call Barak Obama "Osama" and "Barak HUSSEIN Obama" is they are trying to confuse people into thinking he is a crypto-Muslim, will be weak on terrorism, or even worse, will be supportive of Muslim extremist terrorism.

I call him Osama Obama because that's what a drunken Kennedy once did if I recall correctly...........

Hussein is his middle name.

None of this is relevant to my reason not to vote for him.

Would you care to explain to everyone why you think a CFR member is the right person to be President of the US and why that CFR member is better than the other 2 CFR members (Clinton & McCain)?

That is way more relevant than my calling him Osama Obama. Although I do like that name and hope it sticks with him just like Hanoi John!
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Roxdog
Member Avatar

Quote:
 
FYI..the only reason Neo-Cons call Barak Obama

Man, I wish people would learn the actual definition of neocon...
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
JFK
Member Avatar

Sureshot
Feb 29 2008, 02:39 AM
This is interesting...
Quote:
 
November 22, 2005
The Honorable Barack Obama United States Senator for Illinois "Moving Forward on Iraq"

From this page. - http://www.thechicagocouncil.org/chicago_council_worldleaders.php
A copy of the speech can be found here - http://obama.senate.gov/speech/051122-moving_forward/index.php
Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
arbor
Member Avatar

obama wants to end the war. mccain wants it to last a lifetime.

i dont care if he is a CFR member. so is tom brokaw. so are lots of people. im sure i could become a member if i forked over the 50$ membership fee.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Roxdog
Member Avatar

Quote:
 
obama wants to end the war. mccain wants it to last a lifetime.

Obama SAYS he wants to end the war....come 2012. And what he SAYS and how he
VOTES don't seem to jive. But I'm sure you've missed that fact....

Quote:
 
i dont care if he is a CFR member.

We know. Your agenda and theirs practically mirror each other.

Quote:
 
so is tom brokaw. so are lots of people.

And? Your point would be? You think Tom Brokaw tells the truth on TV?
Please tell me you do. Give me one more reason to hate everything you stand for...

Quote:
 
im sure i could become a member if i forked over the 50$ membership fee
.
Wrong, as per usual...

Durrrrrr....
Edited by Roxdog, Feb 29 2008, 06:52 PM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
arbor
Member Avatar

The CFR also has such diabolical members as...Richard Dreyfuss, Katie Couric, and Michael Douglas.

:shocked:
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Roxdog
Member Avatar

Right, all of which, like you, cheerlead global socialism and the erosion of the Bill of Rights, AND WOULD MAKE HORRIBLE PRESIDENTS. Thanks for proving our point for us...lol
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
arbor
Member Avatar

i support some moderate and intelligent gun control. thats the only one of the bill of rights that i seek to "erode"...as you call it.

you do realize, there were no rapid fire machine guns, no 50 caliber rifles, in 1787.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Roxdog
Member Avatar

Quote:
 
i support some moderate and intelligent gun control. thats the only one of the bill of rights that i seek to "erode"...as you call it.

Not as I "call it". As it is. You also seek to redistribute wealth so that would be an erosion of the 4th and seeing as there is no way to redistribute wealth without violating people 5th, you seek to erode that one by default....

Get a clue.

Quote:
 
you do realize, there were no rapid fire machine guns, no 50 caliber rifles, in 1787.

I do realize that but fail to see the relevence since there is none....
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
arbor
Member Avatar

i think that millionaries should pay more in taxes then someone who makes 30k a year. sue me.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Reggie_perrin

Im not voting for BA Barackus Mohammed Husain Osama :D
Edited by Reggie_perrin, Mar 1 2008, 07:51 AM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
arbor
Member Avatar

And Im not voting for Ru Paul Tsongas.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Domenick DiMaggio

arbor
Feb 29 2008, 07:00 PM
i support some moderate and intelligent gun control. thats the only one of the bill of rights that i seek to "erode"...as you call it.

you do realize, there were no rapid fire machine guns, no 50 caliber rifles, in 1787.
you do realize that the government also didn't have rapid fire machine guns or 50 caliber rifles in 1787. perhaps you need a comprehension course on the 2nd Amendment and why militias are necessary.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
arbor
Member Avatar

The "militia", as conceived back in 1787, is as relevant today as is the sword and shield.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Domenick DiMaggio

arbor
Mar 2 2008, 08:33 PM
The "militia", as conceived back in 1787, is as relevant today as is the sword and shield.
youre an american citizen?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
arbor
Member Avatar

LOL. What??

Ja. Ich bin ein Amerikaner.
Edited by arbor, Mar 3 2008, 08:53 AM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Reggie_perrin

According to this complete cretin "al qeada will dance in the street" and celebrate more than after 9/11 if Obama wins.

http://www.crooksandliars.com/2008/03/08/bamas-name-says-al-qaida/
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
« Previous Topic · Election 2008 · Next Topic »
Add Reply