The Evidence Sevon and PBnJ are willfully Ignoring

Welcome!

You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.

Join our community!

The Evidence Sevon and PBnJ are willfully Ignoring
Topic Started: Feb 27 2008, 05:05 PM (209 Views)
Aldo Marquis CIT	Feb 27 2008, 05:05 PM Post #1
Posts: 1,649 Group: Members Member #13 Joined: 01/14/08	This was in another thread but Sevon (Nicepants) and PBnJ tried to hijack it with semantics and distractions. Please do not debate them. This thread is for them to concede and accept the following pieces of evidence. =========================================================== -The photos that show the generator trailer/fence damage is irreconcilable with FDR data and 757 wing/engine in a right wing tilt up. http://z3.invisionfree.com/CIT/index.php?showtopic=6 -The FDR allegedly recovered from the Pentagon is irreconcilable with low and level approach over the lawn. http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3752900324142560520&hl=en -The video that shows an object low and level across the lawn that does not cast shadow, that is IRRECONCILABLE with the FDR and descent angle shown in the data. http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a327/lytetrip/Pentagon/pentanimorig-1.gif -The radar tracking that Monte Belger/Mineta report place the plane DRA near Great Falls and Rosslyn. http://www.msnbc.com/modules/91102/interviews/mineta.asp -The tape of Colin Scoggins reporting (and the radar tracking showing) the plane 6 miles SE of the white house. http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2006/08/norad200608
Posts: 1,649 Group: Members Member #13 Joined: 01/14/08


PBnJ	Feb 27 2008, 05:26 PM Post #2
The Best Sandwich on Earth Posts: 179 Group: Members Member #315 Joined: 02/13/08	Aldo, Aldo.... I'm sorry I'm not responding fast enough for you, I really am. I'm not trying to hijack the threads or derail them, I'm simply dealing with one point at a time. I will get to these other points as time allows me to. Currently, I've been discussing radar positioning on AA77 and the C130, and testimonies from the C130 pilots in other threads with you, Craig, and others. When I feel that I've presented my arguments to the fullest, I will move on to the other points (regardless if you agree with me or still think I'm a "dimwit traitor"). John Quincy Adams Patience and perseverance have a magical effect before which difficulties disappear and obstacles vanish.



Craig Ranke CIT	Feb 27 2008, 07:12 PM Post #3
Posts: 1,459 Group: Members Member #14 Joined: 01/14/08	Aldo no likey official story defenders who obfuscate the evidence.
Posts: 1,459 Group: Members Member #14 Joined: 01/14/08


Bitterman	Feb 27 2008, 10:44 PM Post #4
Posts: 324 Group: Members Member #284 Joined: 02/07/08	They still have yet to duh-bunk the information posed by CITs' footage. All they have is, did the C-130 take off a minute before or a minute after? Wheelhouse was not in that exact postion! Blah blah, go and film it again, and THIS time, go that 50 yards back down toward the tree's so we can see how poor the view is from there! Nyah, nyah! That's all you got? Oh, and Wheelhouse lied, and they back him up.........
Posts: 324 Group: Members Member #284 Joined: 02/07/08


1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)


« Previous Topic · Skeptics · Next Topic »