Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Welcome!

You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.

Join our community!

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
The CIA Keeps Journalists as Assets; USA Today Employs Compromised Reporters?
Topic Started: Feb 27 2008, 01:13 AM (230 Views)
Aldo Marquis CIT
Member Avatar

Quote:
 
"You could get a journalist cheaper than a good call girl, for a couple hundred dollars a month."

--CIA operative discussing with Philip Graham, editor Washington Post, on the availability and prices of journalists willing to peddle CIA propaganda and cover stories. "Katherine The Great," by Deborah Davis (New York: Sheridan Square Press, 1991)


Is it possible that one or some of the USA Today reporters or editors that claim they were on the highway at the time of the Pentagon attack are actually lying and were not there at all?

In light of the north side approach/ascent, blatant problems in their accounts and improbability of their positions on the highway, is it possible that some of them are paid assets or are actual deep cover operatives/"spies" themselves?

http://www.thepentacon.com/LloydEngland_AccompliceVideo.htm#UsaToday

Quote:
 
Starting in the early days of the Cold War (late 40's), the CIA began a secret project called Operation Mockingbird, with the intent of buying influence behind the scenes at major media outlets and putting reporters on the CIA payroll, which has proven to be a stunning ongoing success. The CIA effort to recruit American news organizations and journalists to become spies and disseminators of propaganda, was headed up by Frank Wisner, Allen Dulles, Richard Helms, and Philip Graham (publisher of The Washington Post). Wisner had taken Graham under his wing to direct the program code-named Operation Mockingbird and both have presumably committed suicide.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/analysis_louise_01_03_03_mockingbird.html


Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Aldo Marquis CIT
Member Avatar

Quote:
 
In 1977, Rolling Stone alleged that one of the most important journalists under the control of Operation Mockingbird was Joseph Alsop, whose articles appeared in over 300 different newspapers. Other journalists alleged by Rolling Stone Magazine to have been willing to promote the views of the CIA included Stewart Alsop (New York Herald Tribune), Ben Bradlee (Newsweek), James Reston (New York Times), Charles Douglas Jackson (Time Magazine), Walter Pincus (Washington Post), William C. Baggs (The Miami News), Herb Gold (The Miami News) and Charles Bartlett (Chattanooga Times).According to Nina Burleigh (A Very Private Woman), these journalists sometimes wrote articles that were commissioned by Frank Wisner. The CIA also provided them with classified information to help them with their work.

Source: Carl Bernstein. "CIA and the Media", Rolling Stone Magazine, 20 October 1977. , Wiki
Edited by Aldo Marquis CIT, Feb 27 2008, 01:39 AM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Bitterman

Yeah, anyone want to wager it happened in this case? Wheelhouses' statements are very close to what Terry Scanlon said in his article you guys cited.

Things that make you go hmmm.......
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
22205
Member Avatar
Arlingtonian
hey man i was recently looking in to the topic of famous people who have fallen to their deaths (olson, forrestal) and eventually spooks crossed on to my radar. but on that journey some relevant info popped up that i thought fit well with your topic:


http://www.namebase.org/news17.html

Quote:
 
The final months of 1977 produced three significant pieces of journalism on the CIA and the media, just before the issue was abandoned altogether. The first, by Joe Trento and Dave Roman, reported the connections between Copley Press and the CIA. Owner James S. Copley cooperated with the CIA for three decades. A subsidiary, Copley News Service, was used as a CIA front in Latin America, while reporters at the Copley-owned San Diego Union and Evening News were instructed to spy on antiwar protesters for the FBI. No less than 23 news service employees were simultaneously working for the CIA. James Copley, who died in 1973, was also a leading figure behind the CIA-funded Inter-American Press Association.[13]

The next article was by Carl Bernstein of Watergate fame. In a long piece in Rolling Stone, he came up with the figure of 400 American journalists over the past 25 years, based primarily on interviews with Church committee staffers. This figure included stringers and freelancers who had an understanding that they were expected to help the CIA, as well as a small number of full-time CIA employees using journalism as a cover. It did not include foreigners, nor did it include numerous Americans who traded favors with the CIA in the normal give-and-take between a journalist and his sources. In addition to some of the names already mentioned above, Bernstein supplied details on Stewart and Joseph Alsop, Henry Luce, Barry Bingham Sr. of the Louisville Courier-Journal, Hal Hendrix of the Miami News, columnist C.L. Sulzberger, Richard Salant of CBS, and Philip Graham and John Hayes of the Washington Post.

Bernstein concentrated more on the owners, executives, and editors of news organizations than on individual reporters. "Lets's not pick on some poor reporters, for God's sake," William Colby said at one point to the Church committee's investigators. "Let's go to the management. They were witting." Bernstein noted that Colby had specific definitions for words such as "contract employee," "agent," "asset," "accredited correspondent," "editorial employee," "freelance," "stringer," and even "reporter," and through careful use of these words, the CIA "managed to obscure the most elemental fact about the relationships detailed in its files: i.e., that there was recognition by all parties involved that the cooperating journalists were working for the CIA -- whether or not they were paid or had signed employment contracts."[14]

The reaction to Bernstein's piece among mainstream media was to ignore it, or to suggest that it was sloppy and exaggerated. Then two months later, the New York Times published the results of their "three- month inquiry by a team of Times reporters and researchers." This three-part series not only confirmed Bernstein, but added a wealth of far-ranging details and contained twice as many names. Now almost everyone pretended not to notice.

The Times reported that over the last twenty years, the CIA owned or subsidized more than fifty newspapers, news services, radio stations, periodicals and other communications facilities, most of them overseas. These were used for propaganda efforts, or even as cover for operations. Another dozen foreign news organizations were infiltrated by paid CIA agents. At least 22 American news organizations had employed American journalists who were also working for the CIA, and nearly a dozen American publishing houses printed some of the more than 1,000 books that had been produced or subsidized by the CIA. When asked in a 1976 interview whether the CIA had ever told its media agents what to write, William Colby replied, "Oh, sure, all the time."

Since domestic propaganda was a violation of the their charter, the CIA defined the predictable effects of their foreign publications as "blowback" or "domestic fallout," which they considered to be "inevitable and consequently permissible." But former CIA employees told the Times that apart from this unintended blowback, "some CIA propaganda efforts, especially during the Vietnam War, had been carried out with a view toward their eventual impact in the United States." The Times series concluded that at its peak, the CIA's network "embraced more than 800 news and public information organizations and individuals."[15]

By the time the Times series appeared, Congress was looking for a way out of the issue. Obligingly, Stansfield Turner promised that the CIA would avoid journalists "accredited by any U.S. news service, newspaper, periodical, radio or television network or station." There were at least three problems with this that most press coverage overlooked: many stringers and freelancers are not accredited; it didn't cover any foreign-owned media; and as Gary Hart complained at the time, the new policy included a provision that allowed the CIA to unilaterally make exceptions whenever it wished.[16]


sidebar:
Quote:
 
How can one distinguish between news and propaganda when the overlaps and interlocks are so pervasive? John Chancellor was with NBC, then with Voice of America, and then again with NBC. John Scali was with ABC, and then with Nixon, and then again with ABC. Ben Bradlee, of Watergate and Washington Post fame, was once a propagandist in Paris, taking orders from the CIA station chief, and was friends with James Angleton. Bradley's sister-in-law was Mary Meyer, divorced from Cord Meyer. She was JFK's lover, and her 1964 murder was never solved. Robert John Myers was in the CIA for twenty years, at one time as an assistant to William Colby, and became publisher of the New Republic in 1968. Generoso Paul Pope, Jr. was in the CIA the year before he bought the National Enquirer in 1952. Laughlin Phillips, co-founder of the Washingtonian, was in the CIA for fifteen years. Former top CIA officials Cord Meyer, Jr. and Tom Braden became columnists (unlike Braden, Meyer rarely talks about his CIA career). George R. Packard and L. Bruce van Voorst were with the CIA before they joined Newsweek, and Philip Geyelin worked for the CIA while on leave from the Wall Street Journal.

There's always Katharine Graham*, one of the world's richest women, who is now recognized as a victim of the male-dominated culture because her new autobiography says it's so. In a 1988 speech at CIA headquarters, Graham warmed to her audience: "We live in a dirty and dangerous world. There are some things the general public does not need to know and shouldn't. I believe democracy flourishes when the government can take legitimate steps to keep its secrets, and when the press can decide whether to print what it knows."

Over 100 pundits, news anchors, columnists, commentators, reporters, editors, executives, owners, and publishers can be found by scanning the 1995 membership roster of the Council on Foreign Relations -- the same CFR that issued a report in early 1996 bemoaning the constraints on our poor, beleaguered CIA. By the way, first William Bundy and then William G. Hyland edited CFR's flagship journal Foreign Affairs between the years 1972-1992. Bundy was with the CIA from 1951-1961, and Hyland from 1954-1969.




*Ms.Graham deserves some in depth topic of her own when talking about spooks and news, but briefly here is an over view of her professional life:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katharine_Graham

Katharine Graham's Husband Philip Graham's illness and death:
Quote:
 
After several years of suffering from bipolar disorder, Philip Graham had a nervous breakdown. Around this time, Katharine discovered her husband had been cheating on her with Robin Webb, an Australian stringer for Newsweek. Her husband declared that he would divorce Katharine for Robin and he made motions to divide up the couple's assets.

At a newspaper conference in Phoenix, Arizona, Philip Graham had a nervous breakdown. Katharine flew to Arizona to retrieve him by private jet, and her sedated husband was flown back to Washington. Philip was taken to the private Chestnut Lodge psychiatric facility near Washington, D.C. He was released after a short stay; subsequently suffered a major depression; and then returned to the facility. In 1963, during a weekend release from Chestnut Lodge, while at the couple's Glen Welby home, he committed suicide.



Katherine Graham's Ascension to power:
Quote:
 
Katharine Graham assumed the reins of the company, and of the Post, after Philip Graham's suicide. Graham was de facto publisher of the newspaper from 1963 onward, formally assuming the title in 1979, and chairman of the board from 1973 to 1991...

Graham hired Benjamin Bradlee as editor and cultivated Warren Buffett for his financial advice; he became a major shareholder and something of an eminence grise in the company. Her son Donald was publisher from 1979 to 2000.



Death (on July 17, 2001):
Quote:
 
In 2001, Graham suffered a fall while visiting Sun Valley, Idaho. She died three days after the fall, due to trauma resulting from her fall-related head injury.


try searching for stories that actually express any details of her "fall" and you run into a dead end. such a famous woman who directly influenced media as we know it, and yet the story of her death is almost untold. all you find are blurbs that mention she fell, but there no details whatsoever listed as to the cause of the fall or how it led to her death.

almost every link, i have 5 so far including CBS, CNN, and of course the Washington Post itself, all same thing:

Quote:
 
Mrs. Graham, former chairman and chief executive officer of The Post Co. and former publisher of The Washington Post, died at 11:56 a.m. of head injuries suffered when she fell on a sidewalk Saturday in Sun Valley, Idaho, where she was attending an annual conference of media business leaders.



so anyway, i wanted to point out 2 things: spooks and the media are branches on the same tree, and the real powers that be have no qualms in cutting off their own branches when deemed necessary. the above is just the tip of the iceberg, there are tons of suspicious deaths persons who have directly worked either for the gov, the military, or defense related industries.

there is no denying that the press is complicit in shaping public perception. sadly for those that dont question what they're being told, perception becomes reality. thats the whole purpose of embedding spooks in the media and in the corporations that "protect" america. it doesnt end there, think about this, cuz it was a shocker to me:

robert gates was head of Texas A&M University, before he was appointed the Secretary of Defense. so even our colleges and universities are being run by spooks. they have infiltrated every possible place there is, so its no surprise that the reality we are programmed to perceive is skewed by a very specific vested interest. that interest is currently focusing on islam as a boogeyman. with the coldwar having actually gone cold, it was inevitable that some new "threat" would be the bad guy, and it so happened that islam was next.

so u have 911 and u have the reality they shaped, broadcasted, and programmed the shock and awed masses into believing. its no accident that the media was and is complicit in helping to perpetuate the lies, they are a part of the machine directly, paid for and endoctrinated by spooks and spook money.

end of rant...

but thanks for posting this thread man and i hope i havent hijacked it too far off course.


ps- look into forrestal and olson (linked in the first line of my post). im working on a piece about "jumpers", well fallers actually - so in time i might post it. but forrestal in particular will take you down in to the murky depths of things and let you see how "they" treat their own after they have served their purpose and have become a hinderance. so check him out (when ya find the time of course).





Edited by 22205, Feb 27 2008, 02:42 AM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
SPreston
Member Avatar
Patriotic American
OK looking further into it, I'm not too happy with the source either.

Edited by SPreston, Feb 27 2008, 12:13 PM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Aldo Marquis CIT
Member Avatar

Spreston, please take down that post, it is divisive and separate from the topic of the OP. Frankly I don't trust the source.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
« Previous Topic · Pentagon · Next Topic »
Add Reply