Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Welcome!

You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.

Join our community!

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
Gun Control; Who is for it? Who is against it?
Topic Started: Feb 26 2008, 03:06 PM (3,609 Views)
William Rea Sep 8 2008, 04:31 AM Post #176

Shopnut
Sep 6 2008, 10:32 PM
William Rea
Aug 31 2008, 05:50 AM
My analysis is that it seems more important for a particularly sad section of the male population to get their rocks off on firearms than it is to uphold the rights of everyone else not to get shot.
How does your analysis apply to the female shooting population?
It doesn't, the main indicator of this that you should look out for in the post is that I was specific about the male population.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Shopnut Sep 8 2008, 12:26 PM Post #177

William Rea
Aug 31 2008, 05:50 AM
My analysis is that it seems more important for a particularly sad section of the male population to get their rocks off on firearms than it is to uphold the rights of everyone else not to get shot.
Can you be clearer on what "get their rocks off" means to you? Does it include sport, defense and recreation? Does your phrase mean to describe those who keep firearms as some sort of fetish? If so, what about the other gun owners? Should their right to keep firearms be infringed because of someone else’s desires?
Edited by Shopnut, Sep 10 2008, 06:59 AM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Roxdog Feb 4 2009, 11:59 PM Post #178
Member Avatar
William Rea
Aug 31 2008, 05:50 AM
My analysis is that it seems more important for a particularly sad section of the male population to get their rocks off on firearms than it is to uphold the rights of everyone else not to get shot.

Then your "analysis" is laughable and has been programmed into you in direct conflict with what is natural and instinctual. You are also sexist. I know plenty of woman with the intellect to ascertain why the 2nd amendment is just as important as the 1st. "Get their rocks off"? WTF does that even mean? Mere buzzwords...No substance.

Um, we do uphold the rights of everyone not to be shot. It is called homicide. It is a crime and punishable by death in many states.

Should the government come take your car in an attempt to "uphold my right not to be" run over?

Your logic? Quite flawed.
Edited by Roxdog, Feb 5 2009, 12:00 AM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
« Previous Topic · Current Politics · Next Topic »
Add Reply