The discrepencies of flight 175

Welcome!

You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.

Join our community!

The discrepencies of flight 175; How does one plane arrive from 2 angles?
Topic Started: Jan 16 2009, 07:27 PM (564 Views)
sage	Jan 16 2009, 07:27 PM Post #1
Posts: 3 Group: Members Member #1,020 Joined: 01/16/09	Im new to all this im just an average american with a family who has seen throu the lies, its obvious 9/11 is an inside job but as a fresh pair of eyes in all this one thing is so obvious and i dont know why others dont see it as clearly as i do. There is no getting away from the fact that flight 175 has two seperate approaches to the building, in one it is seen to lose lots of altitude and pull up at the last second and strike the building, in the other it just appears and glides in on an almost level flightpath. something does not add up, it cannot be in both places at the same time, ive come here from youtube looking for some answers ive had a look around and there arent any, i need someone to tell me what the fuc* is going on. I see a lot said about Zionism and i immediately thought about rupert murdoch he owned half the networks and has shares in the others if anyone is capable of pulling off some crazy shi* its him, he can do pretty much anything outside of government but be protected by the zionism iconaclast. somebody please help me with this its driving me crazy.
Posts: 3 Group: Members Member #1,020 Joined: 01/16/09


JFK	Jan 16 2009, 07:41 PM Post #2
Posts: 4,221 Group: Admins Member #108 Joined: 01/17/08	sage Jan 16 2009, 07:27 PM Im new to all this im just an average american with a family who has seen throu the lies, its obvious 9/11 is an inside job but as a fresh pair of eyes in all this one thing is so obvious and i dont know why others dont see it as clearly as i do. There is no getting away from the fact that flight 175 has two seperate approaches to the building, in one it is seen to lose lots of altitude and pull up at the last second and strike the building, in the other it just appears and glides in on an almost level flightpath. something does not add up, it cannot be in both places at the same time, ive come here from youtube looking for some answers ive had a look around and there arent any, i need someone to tell me what the fuc* is going on. I see a lot said about Zionism and i immediately thought about rupert murdoch he owned half the networks and has shares in the others if anyone is capable of pulling off some crazy shi* its him, he can do pretty much anything outside of government but be protected by the zionism iconaclast. somebody please help me with this its driving me crazy. Welcome Sage. Trust me, the majority of us are also anti Rupert Murdock as well. As far as the different views, I think it is to do with the camera location and angle. View the videos in question again with that in mind, and please do post them here as well.
Posts: 4,221 Group: Admins Member #108 Joined: 01/17/08


sage	Jan 16 2009, 08:26 PM Post #3
Posts: 3 Group: Members Member #1,020 Joined: 01/16/09	you know how it is you see something on youtube and dont favorite it, you go to find it again and you can't!! i found another one and it has compounded my confusion further, it seems there are MORE than 2 approach angles, i wait for your reply with anticipation because i know what it is im seeing, i know what it means, but i don't believe it. http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=TVXJCOFT_rA
Posts: 3 Group: Members Member #1,020 Joined: 01/16/09


JFK	Jan 16 2009, 09:10 PM Post #4
Posts: 4,221 Group: Admins Member #108 Joined: 01/17/08	Like I said, the apparently different approach angles were camera location and perspective. This should be able to be proven by creating a 3d plot in any 3d game engine and viewing the approach from the various angles. Many people witnessed the plane, and parts which rained down afterwards. Do a search for "scaffoldrider"s pictures of the parts on adjacent building rooftops and ledges.
Posts: 4,221 Group: Admins Member #108 Joined: 01/17/08


BoneZ	Jan 17 2009, 08:50 AM Post #5
Posts: 725 Group: Members Member #269 Joined: 02/03/08	sage Jan 16 2009, 08:26 PM i found another one and it has compounded my confusion further, it seems there are MORE than 2 approach angles, i wait for your reply with anticipation because i know what it is im seeing, i know what it means, but i don't believe it. It only just "seems" there is more than one approach angle. You don't believe it because you may not understand camera angles and perception. Either way, if you're insinuating that there was no plane, you should go look for a no-plane-theory forum as the 9/11 truth movement does not believe in or accept those theories and is banned from discussion throughout the movement, including here. From the board rules: Quote: NPT theories (no-plane theories), and support of movies like September Clues, is not allowed in any way. Planes hit the WTC. We refuse to allow that to be disputed on this forum.
Posts: 725 Group: Members Member #269 Joined: 02/03/08


JackD	Jan 21 2009, 11:17 PM Post #6
Posts: 263 Group: Members Member #253 Joined: 01/31/08	I don't like those rules. I'm not a no-planers or an NPT but i think that rational civil discussion is the way forward. BoneZ?
Posts: 263 Group: Members Member #253 Joined: 01/31/08


asaf-a	May 2 2009, 02:42 PM Post #7
Posts: 40 Group: Members Member #1,103 Joined: 03/27/09	LOL do you even know what zionism is? The kids these days....
Posts: 40 Group: Members Member #1,103 Joined: 03/27/09


BoneZ	May 2 2009, 06:48 PM Post #8
Posts: 725 Group: Members Member #269 Joined: 02/03/08	asaf-a May 2 2009, 02:42 PM LOL do you even know what zionism is? The kids these days.... I don't know what your point is digging up this thread and hopefully the admins will lock it so it doesn't come up again, but to respond to JackD's question: JackD I don't like those rules. I'm not a no-planers or an NPT but i think that rational civil discussion is the way forward. BoneZ? No-planers cannot have a rational and civil discussion. That was proved at PFT and is being proved at ATS right now. No-planers keep getting banned or their posts deleted because when you debunk their disinfo, they have nothing left but to attack. NPT has been debunked, deemed disinfo and almost the entire 9/11 truth movement has moved on from even acknowleding NPT, and never looked back.
Posts: 725 Group: Members Member #269 Joined: 02/03/08


JFK	May 2 2009, 09:50 PM Post #9
Posts: 4,221 Group: Admins Member #108 Joined: 01/17/08	asaf-a May 2 2009, 02:42 PM LOL do you even know what zionism is? The kids these days.... I do. Do you ?
Posts: 4,221 Group: Admins Member #108 Joined: 01/17/08


asaf-a	May 3 2009, 02:57 PM Post #10
Posts: 40 Group: Members Member #1,103 Joined: 03/27/09	JFK May 2 2009, 09:50 PM asaf-a May 2 2009, 02:42 PM LOL do you even know what zionism is? The kids these days.... I do. Do you ? I was actully referring to the original poster. And yes, i know what zionism is, because i'm most likely a zionist.
Posts: 40 Group: Members Member #1,103 Joined: 03/27/09


1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)


« Previous Topic · United Flight 175 · Next Topic »