Dubious Pentagon witness Rick Renzi indicted

Welcome!

You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.

Join our community!

Dubious Pentagon witness Rick Renzi indicted; theft, extortion, abuse of power.
Topic Started: Feb 23 2008, 03:35 PM (286 Views)
Craig Ranke CIT	Feb 23 2008, 03:35 PM Post #1
Posts: 1,459 Group: Members Member #14 Joined: 01/14/08	Rick Renzi is a well known corrupt Republican congressman who is listed as a witness to the plane hitting the building. He was indicted yesterday (February 22, 2008) on theft, extortion, and conspiracy charges: Renzi indicted in theft, extortion Renzi Indicted in Conspiracy Involving Land Deals Renzi to step down from McCain camp Pressure Mounts on Indicted Rep. Renzi In 2006, Congressman Rick Renzi was named one of the 20 most corrupt members of congress in a report by Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington. Here he is in two interviews, one on the scene on the day of 9/11 and another in a propaganda piece from a month after the event: youtube link He was soon after elected to congress in 2002. Notice how he is sure to be clear he did not mean it was a "bomb". Of course this "dive bombing" description is completely irreconcilable with the official flight path and all the physical damage that requires the plane to come in low and level with the ground. It's clear he was "free styling" details on 9/11 and pushing propaganda in the interview a month later by outlining the neocon agenda at the time that has since come true. "we're ready to export freedom again now". He was not even a congressman yet. The fact that corrupt individuals like this with powerful connections in government were paraded as regular "witnesses" to the plane speaks volumes.
Posts: 1,459 Group: Members Member #14 Joined: 01/14/08


JFK	Feb 23 2008, 03:39 PM Post #2
Posts: 4,218 Group: Admins Member #108 Joined: 01/17/08	Yeah, someone has also already played "connect the dots" back to Mccain. - http://www.progressiveindependent.com/dc/d...p;topic_id=9769
Posts: 4,218 Group: Admins Member #108 Joined: 01/17/08


Bitterman	Feb 23 2008, 03:47 PM Post #3
Posts: 324 Group: Members Member #284 Joined: 02/07/08	Sick man.
Posts: 324 Group: Members Member #284 Joined: 02/07/08


Craig Ranke CIT	Feb 23 2008, 04:22 PM Post #4
Posts: 1,459 Group: Members Member #14 Joined: 01/14/08	Bitterman Feb 23 2008, 03:47 PM Sick man. If you want to really be disgusted watch him blatantly flirt with Katherine Harris of all people with zero respect or regard for the fact that congress is in session and Rep Rob Simmons is discussing 9/11. That is truly gross.
Posts: 1,459 Group: Members Member #14 Joined: 01/14/08


Aldo Marquis CIT	Feb 23 2008, 04:46 PM Post #5
Posts: 1,650 Group: Members Member #13 Joined: 01/14/08	Nice catch Craig. This guy has always been so friggin obvious. What's also interesting is how he was also listed as a law student on 9/13/01. Quote: ''The plane came in at an incredibly steep angle with incredibly high speed,'' said Rick Renzi, a law student who was driving by the Pentagon at the time of the crash about 9:40 a.m. The impact created a huge yellow and orange fireball, he added. Renzi, who was interviewed at the scene by FBI agents, said he stopped his car to watch and saw another plane following and turn off after the first craft's impact. Pentagon spokesman Rear Adm. Craig Quigley said later Tuesday that he also had heard reports of a smaller second plane, but could not confirm it.http://web.archive.org/web/20010920010837/http://www.pittsburgh.com/partners/wpxi/news/pentagonattack.html Interesting how he mentioned that "second plane" on the 13th, but didn't say a word in his televised interview from that day or the bbc one from a month later. Looks like he was a "student" of "criminal justice" in the late 70's. But I could find nothing about him being a "law student" in 2001. Quote: Early life, education, and family ...Renzi graduated from Buena High School and then attended Northern Arizona University, receiving a B.S. in criminal justice in 1980. Renzi played football for NAU and was a starting offensive lineman. Career prior to Congress In 1989, Renzi started Renzi & Company (now called the Patriot Insurance Agency),[10] a company that offers insurance to nonprofit organizations such as crisis pregnancy centers, pregnancy care clinics, maternity homes, PTAs, PTOs, and local service organizations.[11] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rick_Renzi Edited by Aldo Marquis CIT, Feb 23 2008, 10:42 PM.
Posts: 1,650 Group: Members Member #13 Joined: 01/14/08


SPreston	Feb 23 2008, 11:12 PM Post #6
Patriotic American Posts: 1,229 Group: Members Member #122 Joined: 01/18/08	JFK Feb 23 2008, 03:39 PM Yeah, someone has also already played "connect the dots" back to Mccain. - Quote: Rick Renzi Indicted http://progressiveindependent.com/dc/dcboard.php?az=printer_friendly&forum=218&topic_id=9769&mesg_id=9769 Quote: Congressman Rick Renzi (R-Flagstaff, Ariz.), state co-chair for John McCain's Arizona leadership team http://www.kxmc.com/News/Nation/212053.asp Those 9-11 planners sure had a large pool of scumbags to draw on for their official 9-11 Pentagon witnesses. And lo and behold, Rick Renzi has direct connections to Presidential contender scumbag Hanoi Hilton John McCain. Will wonders never cease? Scrap Hanoi Hilton John McCain - Draft Congressman Ron Paul For President!!



Aldo Marquis CIT	Feb 25 2008, 01:09 PM Post #7
Posts: 1,650 Group: Members Member #13 Joined: 01/14/08	It should also be noted that Renzi sat on the House intelligence committee, which oversees the spooks. His dubious and mysterious background indicates he may be a spook himself. His dad who died this month was defense contractor bigwig. http://cannonfire.blogspot.com/2008/02/con...kand-spook.html This person thinks he is/was a spook: http://www.warandpiece.com/blogdirs/007045.html Quote: Exactly what Renzi did for the next two decades is blurry. He has said he worked overseas for the Defense Department, but research turned up no information on which agency, where he was assigned or what duties he had. http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/n...nzi-legacy.html [/i] His dive bomb into the building is IRRECONCILABLE with the low and level approach into the building shown on the surveillance video. Clearly he is lying, he has a shadowy background, has ties to the intelligence community, was elevated to congressman after his 2001 witness appearance, and has a father who was a defense contractor big wig. I'd say he fits the profile of complicit operative on the scene pretending to be a witness. Edited by Aldo Marquis CIT, Feb 25 2008, 01:52 PM.
Posts: 1,650 Group: Members Member #13 Joined: 01/14/08


look-up	Feb 25 2008, 02:31 PM Post #8
Posts: 1,642 Group: Admins Member #63 Joined: 01/15/08	this may be a dumb question, but why does the "five frames" video show "Sept 12th" ???
Posts: 1,642 Group: Admins Member #63 Joined: 01/15/08


Aldo Marquis CIT	Feb 25 2008, 02:43 PM Post #9
Posts: 1,650 Group: Members Member #13 Joined: 01/14/08	It's not a dumb question, as I would like to know also. The five frames were leaked originally and no one would take credit for it, Washington Times: Quote: The photos, which depict a fiery explosion on the building's northwest face, are each dated Sept. 12. Officials say the date may reflect when the images were catalogued by investigators since they are not the actual date of the attack. [...] Officials from the Pentagon said the photos were not released officially by the Department of Defense. A Pentagon spokeswoman could not verify that they came from surveillance cameras. "The Pentagon has not released any video or any photos from security cameras from the terrorist attack of Sept. 11," said Pentagon spokeswoman Cheryl Irwin. A spokeswoman at the Department of Justice, which reviews taped and photographed evidence obtained by federal security cameras, said she could not comment on whether the photos are legitimate, adding that the photos "were not disseminated by the FBI or the Department of Justice." If you look closely, they are also two 19 second marks. The object also casts no shadow. What we believe happened is they released the five frames with the flyover frame missing and the fake object inserted into it. Some believe that it is to hide the real time code. I don't know about that. But they claim it was catalogging purposes as they stated in the article above. Edited by Aldo Marquis CIT, Feb 25 2008, 02:44 PM.
Posts: 1,650 Group: Members Member #13 Joined: 01/14/08


look-up	Feb 25 2008, 03:32 PM Post #10
Posts: 1,642 Group: Admins Member #63 Joined: 01/15/08	it makes sense that it would be when it was catalogued, since it is very reasonable to assume they would not incorrectly fake the date... right? as for the shadow, I don't know if it would have shown a shadow, assuming the object is a real one. it is very low to the ground, and the shadow would have been to the right of the FOV anyways. that's not to say this isn't suspect. the thing I find suspect is the missing fame, as you pointed out (and I'm beginning to really think that a flyover is the only way they could sell the story at all). if you think of it in terms of P.R., it makes perfect sense that the DoD takes no responsibility for releasing it. it's perfect for their side of the story. if they released it, it would give us reason not to trust it. so it's like they're saying, "look someone leaked this and it STILL doesn't prove an inside job"... ah, but it DOES prove it. It proves that they did indeed archive this, recognizing its importance, but DIDN"T show it to the public, which is suspect, and it shows that they altered the video to help the official lie. There is a frame missing. That's a big deal. Also, the white trail of smoke looks a lot more like a missile than any plane I've ever seen. Then the question from debunkers might be: "Why if they altered the video, wouldn't they remove the white smoke? well that would be because it is much easier to add a greyish tail sticking out of the top of an object that is allegedly out of view than it would be to smudge out that larger area and replace it with footage from another day.
Posts: 1,642 Group: Admins Member #63 Joined: 01/15/08


SPreston	Feb 25 2008, 04:18 PM Post #11
Patriotic American Posts: 1,229 Group: Members Member #122 Joined: 01/18/08	look-up this may be a dumb question, but why does the "five frames" video show "Sept 12th" ??? Aldo Marquis CIT It's not a dumb question, as I would like to know also. The five frames were leaked originally and no one would take credit for it, But then later in May 2006. under a Judicial Watch FOIA lawsuit, the Defense Department did release the two videos in which and from which these five frames were apparently altered. Very poor fakes with the control tower a strange shade of red on the side away from the blast and no shadows from the bright flash in the foreground. Perhaps an 'inside leaker' originally and intentionally released the first 5 frames to expose the inside job. The Bush Regime and their 9-11 planners just seem to keep shooting themselves in the foot again and again and again. JW Obtains September 11 Pentagon Videos On May 16, 2006, Judicial Watch forced the Department of Defense to release video footage of American Airlines flight 77 crashing into the Pentagon on 9/11. The videos had been kept secret by the DoD until Judicial Watch filed the FOIA request and, eventually, a lawsuit stating that the DoD had "no legal basis" to refuse release of the footage. On September 15, 2006, Judicial Watch released videos from the CITGO gas station near the Pentagon, which was released by the FBI in response to the FOIA request. http://www.judicialwatch.org/flight77 Judicial Watch September 11 Pentagon Video -- 2 of 2 Judicial Watch September 11 Pentagon Video -- 1 of 2 Footage From Two Pentagon Security Cameras Showing Moments of Attack



Craig Ranke CIT	Feb 27 2008, 01:47 AM Post #12
Posts: 1,459 Group: Members Member #14 Joined: 01/14/08	Quote: Renzi: I was three-hundred yards away from the Pentagon on September 11, 2001. I saw the destruction and loss of life first hand. I will never forget the acts of terrorism committed on our soil, against our fellow citizens. ... Having worked in the intelligence field, I know first hand that we need to rebuild our intelligence community to guarantee better communication among the agencies. Through my service on the Select Committee on Intelligence, I will work to strengthen our human intelligence capabilities in order stop threats from taking action. I will stand with President Bush and support his efforts to root out those who would conduct evil acts against the United States and make sure we defeat terrorism at every turn. source Renzi is a spook.
Posts: 1,459 Group: Members Member #14 Joined: 01/14/08


1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)


« Previous Topic · Pentagon · Next Topic »