Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Viewing Single Post From: Is The North American Union Real?
mynameis
Member Avatar
Internet Jujitsu
Illuminate
Jun 25 2008, 03:50 AM
Quote:
 
Incorrect. Private sector companies writes laws for itself and self regulation all the time.
Private sector companies don't write the law, this is simple. Governments write the law. You think a corporation is one day going to announce, "Hey, we just merged Mexico and the US. You know, we just wrote a few laws back at head office. Done deal.".
Quote:
 
I am serious, while you are playing at bootlicking.
Right, name a government official who is guilty of treason and espionage then, and show me the law.
Quote:
 
If financial experts are are academics you should move your money into gold I heard it from academics.
WTF? The question was who are the "people" that are talking about an Amero? As I keep saying, yes, "people" are talking about it, but who are these people?
Quote:
 
Stay on topic? I am answering The truth. Since you can't read like the truth nor communicate logically, go illuminate Saddam's crack.
And you have a Truther (TM) badge that says you can troll like that here. Enjoy.
Quote:
 
I am not under any impressions about international trade. Trade is historic and has always existed since ancient times. Stay off the topic unless you can answer the truth properly and without moronic statements.
So it was on topic when you brought it up and off topic when i responded. Oh wait you're flashing the Truther (TM) badge again.
Quote:
 
Free trade deregulations in countries whose regulations were circumvented were worse for the general welfare of the countries: worker's rights, financially, environmentally, and medically. As I said before you don't know anything but what you're spoon fed by corporate media. China is now experiencing all the above along with financial trade irregularities just like those under NAFTA and CAFTA via the corrupt government disenfranchisement. China also has good points, which do outweigh much of the general welfare issues, but the polices are centralized to the government taking a socialist approach to business run by a socialist republic/communist regime.
Totally incoherent.

Its not that complicated. Have you got anything besides Lou Dobbs, an academic, and racist crank Jerome Corsi? We've been through so many posts now yet nothing of substance is ever provided? WHERE IS THE EVIDENCE OF PLANS FOR AN NAU OR AN AMERO?


Quote:
 
The energy bill was mired in secrecy from its inception, when Vice President Cheney's energy task force met to develop proposals that formed the basis of the legislation. An analysis by Public Citizen of some public documents shows that at least seven energy industry executives and lobbyists met with the task force, and that several members of that group are major fund-raisers for the Bush-Cheney campaign. Virtually all of the energy companies whose leaders met with the task force would benefit from the tax credits, subsidies, and deregulation laid out in the energy package.

Once the energy proposal wen to the Hill, Democrats were not permitted entry into the closed-door talks to write the complicated bill.


http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2004/10/03/back_room_dealing_a_capitol_trend/

1) The energy bill recently was written by industry professionals and companies in the field, not lawmakers idiot.

As was the Medicare act insurance bill.

http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/extract/351/18/1891

2.)
Quote:
 
All civilian employees in the executive branch of the federal government, except the President and the Vice President, are covered by the provisions of the Hatch Act.

These employees may not:

* use official authority or influence to interfere with an election
* solicit or discourage political activity of anyone with business before their agency
* solicit or receive political contributions (may be done in certain limited situations by federal labor or other employee organizations)
* be candidates for public office in partisan elections
* engage in political activity while:
o on duty
o in a government office
o wearing an official uniform
o using a government vehicle
* wear partisan political buttons on duty

(Washington White House GOP)
For starters this small little e-mail system has them committing violations of the Hatch Act.
http://articles.latimes.com/2007/apr/12/nation/na-emails12

Quote:
 
The Economic Espionage Act (EEA) is a US Federal law established in 1996 that makes stealing trade secrets a criminal offense, and thus punishable. Prior to the establishment of the Economic Espionage Act, the Uniform Trade Secrets Act (UTSA) of 1970 made theft of trade secrets a civil offense, and those who illegally profited from such theft could be sued for the profits that should have belonged to the company holding the trade secret.


Rick Perry & Texas (Dems & GOP)
http://www.infrasite.net/news/news_article.php?ID_nieuwsberichten=5094&language=en

3.) People like the Federal Reserve Board for starters but you wouldn't know that you're a moron.

Quote:
 
The idea of a single currency for the United States, Canada, and Mexico is not new and has usually referred to one of two approaches. The first, and most discussed, is the unilateral adoption of the U.S. dollar by Canada and Mexico, otherwise known as dollarization. Dollarization has been advocated for not only Canada and Mexico but also many other countries in the Western Hemisphere (Hausmann 1999; Schuler 1999). Some Latin American countries are already dollarized: Ecuador unilaterally dollarized its economy in September 2000, and Panama has employed the U.S. dollar as its currency since 1904. Monetary union is the other interpretation of the single-currency idea; that is, rather than unilateral adoption of the U.S. dollar, a joint currency could be developed and managed by a number of countries.


http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa5423/is_200010/ai_n21465019/pg_1?tag=artBody;col1

4.) Nobody we are discussing is saying Union if you can't read they say North American Community as the word idiot.

http://www.senate.gov/~foreign/testimony/2005/PastorTestimony050609.pdf


5.)
Quote:
 
And you have a Truther (TM) badge that says you can troll like that here. Enjoy.

This makes no lick of sense.

6.)
Quote:
 
So it was on topic when you brought it up and off topic when i responded. Oh wait you're flashing the Truther (TM) badge again.


Again you fail to read. The Truth asked a question you veered off topic into a ditch like usual. You are a complete idiot who doesn't do anything here except try to proof the sky isn't falling. I am also not a truther dumbass, I bet you don't even understand what I just wrote there do you...lemme bold that for you. I am not a truther dumbass.

7.)
Quote:
 
Totally incoherent.

Its not that complicated. Have you got anything besides Lou Dobbs, an academic, and racist crank Jerome Corsi? We've been through so many posts now yet nothing of substance is ever provided? WHERE IS THE EVIDENCE OF PLANS FOR AN NAU OR AN AMERO?


That's because the IQ and reading level at James Randi Foundation is that of a third grader like George Bush reading "My Pet Goat."
Edited by mynameis, Jun 25 2008, 07:17 AM.
Offline Profile Quote Post
Is The North American Union Real? · New World Order