Illuminate

Jun 24 2008, 11:58 AM

Quote:

 

They wanted harmonization done in secret via the private sector and the public face being the SPP.

First of all, that makes no sense. The private sector cannot harmonise government. Governments make the laws. Secondly this is just your way of saying that the fact that there is no evidence proves that there is a conspiracy, because if there was a conspiracy they would cover up all the evidence.

Quote:

 

The proof is we have our officials at meetings together with officers of foreign governments, which is a treasonable offense and espionage without governmental consent.

LOL, get serious!

Quote:

 

Not to mention people talking about a Union and the Amero, two points that lead to the conclusion of an attempt to create a Union discussed by those officers and citizens committing the espionage in those secret meetings.

"People" talking. What people? Academics? Again, this is a consistent attempt to misrepresent the views of private individuals and academics as government policy. The reason you do this is because you cannot come up with any real evidence.

Quote:

 

the debate should not be whether it is documented as law... but whether there is a push by the establishment to move in that direction, and how diligently they are moving forward.

But there is no push - that's why you keep having to misrepresent statements by academics, or fearmongering by pundits, as evidence of a real government plan.

Quote:

 

I think that particular debate has been proven futile for your side. Perhaps if you moved the goalposts a little more you'd win an argument?

That's hilarious. Who's moving the goalposts here? I just asked for evidence, and I never get any. Myname has now moved the goal posts are far as possible - because this is all "secret" we can't expect any evidence at all.

Quote:

 

This treaty was signed into law as an alternative way to send U.S. manufacturers into other countries in the Americas, which were prohibited by laws and regulations to do business. The primary goal is for the stock holder's and a corporations black ink.

Well no actually. Its funny how the supposedly anti-government types here are so horrified to imagine a world where the government doesn't decide who is allowed to trade what with whom.

Quote:

 

The Bureau of International Settlements (BIS), the World Bank(WB), and the International Montetary Fund (IMF) held countries, around and below the equator, on massive debts, which changed the political structure of those countries. Countries with massive debts which receive aid from the IMF, WB, and BIS must concede to the repayment conditions and conciliations for a number of years, as set by those organizations.

Lets stay on topic shall we?

Quote:

 

By weakening internal business laws, worker rights, and environmental laws, CAFTA and NAFTA allowed many corporations to take full advantage of the workers rights and lax business regulations or none thereof; thwarted and prevented by the BIS, WB, and IMF.

Right, so you want international standardisation of workers rights and business regulations? Again, you seem to be a big fan of big government. Free trade removes government from trade. That's a good thing.

Quote:

 

After companies in the United States left for the border to compete on the global market; our companies: corrupted those country's national politics, polluted on massive scales, continuously abused worker's rights, and fled in the end for China where worker wages were next to nothing.

Are you under the impression that international trade, and imports from poor countries, were invented in 1994?