Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Viewing Single Post From: What happened to the passengers
SPreston
Member Avatar
Patriotic American
Posted Image

This above is not a flight manifest. It is a lovely graphic manufactured by a newspaper staff working for the 9-11 planners. There is nothing official or legal about it. Anybody could invent their own fake manifest. If AA released a partial list of only 75 names on Sept 13 2001, then how did the MSM whores come up with 81 and 87 and 89 and 92 and 94 and 97 names before then?

This is a flight manifest.
Posted Image

Here is another lovely graphic from somebody which is not a flight manifest legal document.
Posted Image

There is no official flight manifest legal document for AA Flight 11. Apparently there are no official flight manifest legal documents for the other alleged hijacked 9-11 flights either. All of the alleged flight manifests for Flight 11 have been made public by the Corrupt Mainstream News Media and they are all different with duplicated names or invented names. Jude Larson and Natalie Larson are on some lists and not on others. Robin Caplin is on some lists and not on others. - CNN list - Kelly Booms and Pendyala Vamsikrishna are on the USA Today list and not the CNN list. - USA Today list - CNN list - Partial list - Guardian - Washington Post Sept 12 - Washington Post - Faux News 81 on board Flt 11 - Fox

The fake passenger lists vary between 75 and 97. Many have no Arabic names. Many have different names. There is no verified official flight manifest legal document for AA Flight 11. Even the fake hijackers have unverified names which are apparently stolen identities. There were no aircraft hijackings on 9-11.

When are you people going to wake up and admit you have been CONned? These Mainstream News Media Whores are really lousy liars aren't they? :cigar:

Media published fake passenger lists for American Airlines Flight 11
 
Supporters of the official story seem to support this view. In the face of mounting evidence that none of the Sept 11 crashes were actually caused by the planes alleged to have been involved (some of this evidence is linked at the conclusion of this article), supporters of the official story will often reply with a demand to know exactly what happened to the alleged passengers, illogically imagining the lack of a specific answer to represent a flaw in the no planes/substitute planes argument. Implicit in this demand is the belief that there is solid documentation of who the passengers were.

Anybody can put up a website, do an interview or send an email, claiming to be family or friend of a plane victim. But the only credible, official source for such information is the airline passenger list, and the only credible source for obtaining this information is the airline itself, or authorities and media to which the airline makes it available. One can't demand an explanation of what happened to particular people alleged to be on the flight unless one can prove that they were on the flight. Implicit in the official story is the assumption that such information has been established in the public domain by the media.
http://archive.indymedia.be/news/2004/05/84711.html
Offline Profile Quote Post
What happened to the passengers · American Flight 11