Viewing Single Post From: "Cell Phones Don't Work on a Plane ..."

Viewing Single Post From: "Cell Phones Don't Work on a Plane ..."
A-Train	Jun 7 2008, 08:02 PM
Posts: 10 Group: Members Member #47 Joined: 01/15/08	look-up Jun 5 2008, 10:08 AM fair enough, at least you are not behaving like the other so-called skeptics that come here to troll. at least you are discussing with some honesty. So researchers have said that below 2000 ft calls are possible, but unlikely. So we'll for sake of argument assume that a call went through. Now, how believable is it that the plane was travelling at below 2000 ft for so long before the nosedive? I'm pretty sure that ISN'T what the alleged FDR data says, but I'll have to check into that. First of all, I don't know what you mean by a "skeptic." I am a truther. I believe the phone calls are real but that they do not support the official story. I believe the hijackings were carried out by agents, some of whom were disguised as Arabs. The phone calls were allowed so that callers would pass on their false impression of an "Arab" hijacking, and Arabs would thus be framed for the attacks. I dispute that calls were "possible but unlikely" below 2000ft. In fact, they were possible up to 10,000 feet and even up to 20,000 feet. The odds of a call, like Renee May's cell phone call from AAL77, which may have been between ten and twenty thousand feet at the time, are approximately about 1-5 percent. That would mean she would have gotten through one to five times out of a hundred tries. It's not hard to imagine her in this situation continuously pressing the redial button on her cell phone dozens, if not hundreds, of times in a desperate attempt to contact loved ones.
Posts: 10 Group: Members Member #47 Joined: 01/15/08

"Cell Phones Don't Work on a Plane ..." · United Flight 93