|
Viewing Single Post From: SPLIT - reheats faith based accusation
|
|
JFK
|
Jun 5 2008, 01:11 PM
|
|
- Posts:
- 4,165
- Group:
- Admins
- Member
- #108
- Joined:
- 01/17/08
|
- Aldo Marquis CIT
- Jun 5 2008, 12:45 PM
- JFK
- Jun 5 2008, 12:34 PM
- Aldo Marquis CIT
- Jun 5 2008, 12:16 PM
- JFK
- Jun 5 2008, 10:13 AM
As far as the 84 RADES data, I am currently assuming that is it valid. Thus far I have seen nothing to deem it otherwise.
JFK, Don't let him bully you. The RADES data is fruadelant on so many levels. Let's start with Chaconas. He proves it is fraudelant. The north side witnesses prove it is fraudelant. Even our biggest detractor and 757 impact proponent, John Farmer, admits the RADES data is fraudelant.
Aldo, I am not letting him "bully" me.... And just to make you aware, you won't either.  At this point I am still new to the RADES data and software and prefer to keep an open mind as to it being legit.
Uh ok, JFK. I wasn't trying to bully you. But clearly, Reheat did by bullying you with his emotionally charged strawman about the 84 RADES crew. May remind you of this: http://s1.zetaboards.com/LooseChangeForums/topic/222497/You posted this JFK. You do know that this proves the RADES data fraudelant, don't you? I suggest you do some research, as this information has been around for quite a while now. Do you need more evidence?
Yes Aldo I am well aware of that thread... as a matter of fact I have synchronized the NORAD tapes with the RS3 software and watched what it is that they were talking about.
My conclusion is that the only ones who did not have their head up their ass on 911 is Boston Center in Nashua, NH.
Some research ?
 What is it that you think I am doing ? 
Honestly, what I would love is for someone to hand me the data tag from 77 with a verifiable chain of custody which leads back to inside of the Pentagon..... 
But I realize that will never happen.
So unless you object to me researching what is available to research within my resources, I will continue.... Actually, I will continue regardless of whether you object.
|
|
|
10:53 AM Nov 27
