Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Viewing Single Post From: SPLIT - reheats faith based accusation
Aldo Marquis CIT
Member Avatar

JFK
Jun 5 2008, 12:34 PM
Aldo Marquis CIT
Jun 5 2008, 12:16 PM
JFK
Jun 5 2008, 10:13 AM
As far as the 84 RADES data, I am currently assuming that is it valid. Thus far I have seen nothing to deem it otherwise.
JFK,

Don't let him bully you. The RADES data is fruadelant on so many levels.

Let's start with Chaconas. He proves it is fraudelant. The north side witnesses prove it is fraudelant.

Even our biggest detractor and 757 impact proponent, John Farmer, admits the RADES data is fraudelant.
Aldo, I am not letting him "bully" me.... And just to make you aware, you won't either. ;)

At this point I am still new to the RADES data and software and prefer to keep an open mind as to it being legit.

Uh ok, JFK. I wasn't trying to bully you. But clearly, Reheat did by bullying you with his emotionally charged strawman about the 84 RADES crew.

May I remind you of this:
http://s1.zetaboards.com/LooseChangeForums/topic/222497/

You posted this JFK.

You do know that this proves the RADES data fraudelant, don't you?

I suggest you do some research, as this information has been around for quite a while now.

Do you need more evidence?

Edited by Aldo Marquis CIT, Jun 5 2008, 12:57 PM.
Offline Profile Quote Post
SPLIT - reheats faith based accusation · American Flight 77