| Viewing Single Post From: SPLIT - reheats faith based accusation | |
|---|---|
| JFK | Jun 5 2008, 10:13 AM |
|
Well, I suggest you take your facts a bit further back in history. Might I suggest you begin with an islamic prince named Abdul Rahman and find out what his story is in regards to a Mr. Foster, let alone the President(s) of the US at that point in time. Once you do that, mentally put yourself in his shoes and see where the future leads.  As far as the military, as you know I was also a part of that and I will defend them as a rule.... BUT I also realize that there are a few "bad eggs" in the military also. Those are the exception to the rule. I am forced to wonder with your constant obstifucation of issues here if you are one of those "bad eggs". Look reheat, I ( and most people here ) only want the truth of what happened on 911. I have lost faith in anything which Bush and his administration have to offer as far as facts because in my eyes they have been caught in way too many lies. To find the truth you first have to come up with a theory. Then investigate it, and if it is false that will soon become self evident. You and your peers are actually degrading that effort with your actions, and are actually undermining the reputation of the military. If there is a domestic threat, and I believe that there is an extremely serious one in the Whitehouse, YOU have sworn an oath to defend against it, as have I. When will you begin to take that oath serious as I have ? As far as CIT, They have done more than you will ever do as far as attempting to uncover the truth. The information they have gathered is indeed interesting. Now hear this - I will not censor their efforts while I have any say about it on this forum. Anyone attempting to censor their efforts will be dealt with. That includes you. The exception to that "rule" is if they ( CIT ) should stray into an area which would compromise the security of the nation, something which is entirely possible, albeit unlikely. As far as the 84 RADES data, I am currently assuming that is it valid. Thus far I have seen nothing to deem it otherwise. I would have preferred that it was entirely compiled by "machines", but you work with what you have. Should I not study what it has to say because people like you attack people like me for daring to look at that data ? Sorry bub, the country which I grew up in and swore my allegiance to forbids that from ever happening. |
 |
|
| SPLIT - reheats faith based accusation · American Flight 77 | |
3:21 AM Dec 6
