| Viewing Single Post From: "Cell Phones Don't Work on a Plane ..." | |
|---|---|
| look-up | Jun 5 2008, 10:08 AM |
|
fair enough, at least you are not behaving like the other so-called skeptics that come here to troll. at least you are discussing with some honesty. So researchers have said that below 2000 ft calls are possible, but unlikely. So we'll for sake of argument assume that a call went through. Now, how believable is it that the plane was travelling at below 2000 ft for so long before the nosedive? I'm pretty sure that ISN'T what the alleged FDR data says, but I'll have to check into that. What we are left with here is really this... If the FDR data says the plane was above 2000 ft, we can assume that either the call was not made from the plane, or that a freak occurance of nature that allowed a connection to take place and hold for a period of time, coincided with this already miraculous event called "9/11", where lots of freak occurances are alleged to have taken place. What I am saying is this. No one can prove the phone calls DIDN'T happen, and equally no one can prove that they did happen, or if they can prove they did, that those calls originated form the plane in question. People should be equally skeptical of data that supposedly proves the calls took place, especially when all we have is a government agencies "word" that they did. A relative hearing their loved one's voice does not mean that the call actually took place on the plane. I am neutral on this, however, since like I said, even if the calls did take place, it would be a very convenient coincidence, which stacked with all of the other strange coincidences on 9/11, should cast serious doubt on the "randomness" of all of these things happening. One freak occurance might be a coincidence. I could litterally name dozens of them though. How convenient, huh? |
 |
|
| "Cell Phones Don't Work on a Plane ..." · United Flight 93 | |
12:46 AM Nov 29
