Viewing Single Post From: SPLIT - reheats faith based accusation

Viewing Single Post From: SPLIT - reheats faith based accusation
Reheat	Jun 5 2008, 09:04 AM
Reheat Posts: 137 Group: BANNED! Member #605 Joined: 05/24/08	JFK Jun 4 2008, 10:20 PM I based the title upon this statement : reheat Islamic radicals already determined a way to exploit a weakness in the system and I'm not about to give them any additional help. You have already said you have no first hand proof, therefore it is your faith which led you to make that accusation. Wrong! What I have done is look at the REAL evidence and let that lead me to a conclusion. What you do is BEGIN with a foregone conclusion and attempt to make pieces fit with that conclusion. A prime example is CIT. They went to Washington with the intent to interview people who they thought could prove the "Official Story" wrong. Only interviewed people who fit their preconception and then "cherry picked" that evidence to fit with their theory. A prime example of a "bass ackwards" investigation. All evidence which does not fit is either "hand waved" away, ignored, or spun with convoluted logic. Look, I spent over 20 years in the military. I know thousands of military folks and have worked intimately with most of them. Even flew in combat with some of them. I've worked at the Pentagon and am reasonably familiar with the area. Once you even begin to accuse even one military person of complicity in any kind of an "inside job" that gets my attention. In the case of virtually any alternate scenario you are accusing literally thousands of military folks of being "in on it". It is a baseless accusation without merit. 84 RADES is just one example of these baseless accusations. They are accused in this very Forum of producing false data. These are % 99 enlisted folks with a 1LT Commander. I do not and will not believe for a second that these people would either produce false data or allow it to be published without speaking out. I will reject that accusation from now until doomsday unless you have irrefutable proof and at present there is NONE, not even any reliable evidence to indicate suspicion. So, you call mine a faith based conclusion or ("accusation") when it is actually a conclusion and an opinion based on EVIDENCE, whereas you only have what is invented in deluded agenda driven minds based upon speculation.


SPLIT - reheats faith based accusation · American Flight 77