| Viewing Single Post From: Questions after watching loose change | |
|---|---|
| Illuminate | May 15 2008, 06:24 AM |
|
1. Hani Hanjour had private and commercial pilots licenses. The chief flight instructor that refused to rent him the Cessna said "Despite Hanjour's poor reviews, he did have some ability as a pilot... There's no doubt in my mind that once that [hijacked jet] got going, he could have pointed that plane at a building and hit it". Other pilots have stepped forward to say that there was nothing extremely demanding about they flying Hanjour had to do. Loose Change doesn't think this is worth mentioning. 2. More applicable for WTC 7, which was damaged near the bottom (hence video of building falling to the side all clearly were blown out from the bottom). A falling over of WTC 7 does seem possible. However, truthers have worked themselves into a corner again since their videos show that CD can result in a building falling straight down or to the side, so how can either one "prove" a CD? There is no explanation. And truthers tend to say that WTC 1&2 should have fallen to the side too (in reality none of them fell literally straight down into their own footprint anyway). Its all a bit confusing because truthers say all three looked like CD, even though they looked completely different. Basically, the definition of what a CD looks like is made up as you go along. 3. This is something truthers don't like to explain. They vaguely allude to all kinds of demolitions, simultaneous use of explosives and thermite, and whenever the evidence is lacking they just assume some new technology is being used. There is audio of booms, there are witness accounts of explosions, but the series of sharp, sequential bangs you would normally hear didn't happen. Again, all you have to do is just assume some kind of new unspecified technology which explains away every missing piece of evidence. 4. Simple. Jowenko is an expert when he agrees with the conpsiracy, and wrong when he disagrees with it. Also, when he agrees, all he has to do is watch a youtube video with no sound. No report or analysis is required, just accept it without question. |
 |
|
| Questions after watching loose change · Skeptics | |
3:31 PM Dec 5
