Viewing Single Post From: Questions after watching loose change

Viewing Single Post From: Questions after watching loose change
Zarxrax	May 14 2008, 08:52 PM
Posts: 2 Group: Members Member #572 Joined: 05/14/08	JFK May 14 2008, 07:16 PM 3. Yes... Some call him a shill, but you can decide for yourself. - http://www.911eyewitness.com/ 4. IMO Jonwenko(sp) saw the towers collapse beforehand and was fed the same lies we all were and therefore he was biased in his interpretation of those 2 collapses... He did not know about building 7 until that interview. As for your answer to point 3, it looks like I have to buy something from that site... any other sources? And regarding point 4, if he saw the other two towers collapse beforehand, and he is supposedly an expert in this, then shouldn't it be obvious to him that the first two towers were a controlled demolition despite what he was told? As a similar example, lets say there's some guy who is an expert on bears, and then he sees a news report that a bear at the zoo attacked someone, and they show video footage of a tiger attacking someone. As an expert on bears, he would know right away that the footage was not depicting a bear attack. But you know, I was just about ready to accept your explanation about this guy, but then I decided to toss his name into google (google suggested jowenko as the correct spelling). It turns up this video of Mr. Jowenko saying that there is no way the towers 1 and 2 were controlled demolitions. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EkZMQAC95kI I'd actually be really interested in seeing if the guys opinions on tower 7 had changed now. Edited by Zarxrax, May 14 2008, 08:53 PM.
Posts: 2 Group: Members Member #572 Joined: 05/14/08

Questions after watching loose change · Skeptics