Our brush with death was frighteningly close. When our company made the travel arrangements for our trip to LA two months ago, [my spouse] told the staff to book us on the American flight 11, the flight we usually take to LA, but in the day it took for the travel agent to get back to us, the price of the flight had gone up several hundred dollars, and for economic reasons only, [my spouse] instructed the staff to look for a less expensive flight. Fortunately, Delta Airlines had a lower fare. With gallows humor we have all been expressing how grateful we are that [my spouse] is so economy-minded when it comes to travel expenses. Humor aside, though, we are all shaken by how close a call this was, and humbled by the realization that with all of these coincidences, Someone Above must be looking out for us.
Since Flight 11 allegedly had so many empty seats, the seat price should have gone down; not up several hundred dollars. Since Flight 11 never officially took off or was never properly recorded as taking off, a person wonders if any real living people actually bought the expensive seats on Flight 11. Why didn't the mainstream news media discover and report this amazing coincidence? We know they were digging deeply, back during the several weeks after 9-11, for every teenzy tidbit of information they could feed the terrified American people with. How could they have possibly missed this?
Obviously the 9-11 planners wanted AA Flight 11 ticketing to remain on the open market, but also restricting the number of passengers boarding. Assuming that Flight 11 never took off from Boston as it seems, were the passengers who did board murdered inside a hanger or were they all just shills for the 9-11 planners? From my past experience prior to 9-11, Delta tickets were usually a bit more expensive than AA, but I preferred the superior Delta comforts and passenger treatment anyway.
AA Flight 11@7:45am also did not take off from Boston Logan. A total of 40 aircraft did not take off from Logan on 9-11-2001. Five of the 40 were listed as MIA. Besides Flight 11, only 3 other aircraft of the 40 failed to take off as scheduled before national ground stop (9:25 am). (Flight 195@9:00am, Flight 449@8:50am (MIA), Flight 1821@9:19am) RITA Detailed Statistics Departures
Greg Szymanski
Besides the FAA deregistration issue, solid evidence has also come forward that two of the 9/11 flights, Flight 11 and 77, never even existed at all, according to Bureau of Traffic Safety (BTS) records.
According to BTS statistics, both 11 and 77 officially never took-off on 9/11. The meticulous data kept on every airliner taking-off at every airport in the country also showed no elapsed run-way time, wheels-off time and taxi-out time, not to mention several other categories left blank on 9/11 concerning the two flights.
Although Flights 11 and 77 have the above data meticulously logged on 9/10, it was suspiciously absent on 9/11, even when every other plane that took off that day had been recorded and logged by the BTS.
Why the discrepancy? No one has ever given an official explanation for the BTS missing flight data, even though it is well known that airports are extremely concerned about recording accurate BTS data for each and every flight in and out of its airport for liability purposes.
More importantly critics contend this is another clear indication Flight 11 and 77 were only 'phantom flights," adding even further doubt to the credibility of the official government story concerning 9/11. http://www.rense.com/general68/911h.htm
Greg Szymanski
Two of the 9/11 airliners were never 'deregistered' and remained on the 'active' flight list until Sept. 28. 2005, the classification officially changing only a month after two inquisitive flight researchers made repeated calls to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), inquiring about the strange irregularity.
The two planes in question were Flight 93 and Flight 175, both owned and operated by United Airlines and, according to the official story, both destroyed on 9/11, one in Shanksville, Penn., and the other crashing into the South Tower of the WTC.
Usually a normal procedure after an airliner is destroyed, why it took United more than four years to 'deregister' the airplanes and fill out the official FAA paperwork remains a mystery and never has been fully explained by the FAA, United or the government.
In fact, in stark contrast, a check of FAA records shows the two other American Airline flights, Flight 11 and 77, both were 'deregistered' and classified as 'destroyed' only months after 9/11 on Jan. 14, 2002. http://www.rense.com/general68/911h.htm
Apparently AA Flight 77@8:10am along with 13 other aircraft never took off from Washington Dulles and the tail numbers of all 14 aircraft were listed as UNKNOW which must be routine for aircraft which do not take off. Of course all 13 of the other aircraft were held because their departure times were after national ground stop (9:25 am), except for Flight Number 573@9:23am which was likely late out on the taxiway and held on the ground by national ground stop (9:25 am).
Not only did tail number N644AA (Flight 77) not take off on 9-11 from Dulles, but there is no record of N644AA arriving at Dulles in the 10 days preceding 9-11. Check Arrivals at Dulles here Check departures here
According to elreb, it seems that N644AA was out of service for at least one month and 10 days preceding 9-11.
elreb
I can not seem to find N644AA (Pentagon) anywhere!
I checked 300 airports on September 08, 09, 10, 11 on 2001 and I just can not find this plane anywhere.
I even checked Aviation Photos showing the plane at BOS on 07 August 2001 but checking BTS records doesn’t show the plane being there anytime during the entire month. How could this happen? http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum//index.php?showtopic=10488
10:54 AM Dec 1
