| Viewing Single Post From: "Cell Phones Don't Work on a Plane ..." | |
|---|---|
| A-Train | Apr 29 2008, 07:06 PM |
|
The case of Cee Cee Lyles' cell phone calls to Lorne is easy enough to understand. She made one call at 9:47, on an airphone, and left a message that we can all hear in the Moussaoui trial exhibit. The second call was made on a cell phone at 9:58. UAL93 crashed no later than 10:06, eight minutes later. So presumably the plane was at a low altitude when the second call was made, and therefore under conditions when cell phone calls are indeed possible. ---------------- The case of Burnett's calls is more complicated. All three calls were certainly made by airphones, as indicated in the Moussaoui exhibit. Did Deena Burnett really see his cell number on her caller ID? I greatly doubt it. Yet there is no denying that such is stated in the book she and Tom Giombetti wrote. She also allegedly said she saw the number on her caller ID in her interview with the FBI, as quoted by Shoestring. I wouldn't put any faith in the FBI interview. It is well known that Deena Burnett reported that Tom had seen a gun in the possession of the hijackers. This information is devastating to the official story, pointing to a professional operation beyond the scope of any Arab group. In addition, there is credible evidence that Betty Ong also reported a gun in her phone call from AAL11, and that that report has been covered up by the authorities: http://s1.zetaboards.com/LooseChangeForums/topic/46741/1/#new When questioned about the report of a gun, Deena said:
And yet, amazingly, the FBI interview with Deena Burnett does not mention the report of a gun whatsoever! http://intelfiles.egoplex.com/2001-09-11-FBI-FD302-deena-lynne-burnett.pdf We should be aware of the possibility of a disinformation campaign to discredit all the phone calls, by suggesting they were cell calls, and therefore impossible. The phone calls contain information devastating to the official story, such as the reports of guns. Moreover, nothing in the calls really shows that the hijackers were who the government says they were-- only that they were "Middle Eastern looking," which they undoubtedly were, but which might only mean they were posing as Arabs to frame Arabs for the crime. I don't know how the cell phone claim worked its way into the book supposedly written by Deena and ghostwriter Giombetti. But my guess is that it is a hoax, and Deena herself is playing along for one reason or another. |
 |
|
| "Cell Phones Don't Work on a Plane ..." · United Flight 93 | |
2:53 PM Nov 28
