| Viewing Single Post From: Denial Stops Here: 9/11 To Peak Oil And Beyond | |
|---|---|
| Roxdog | Apr 24 2008, 03:09 PM |
|
Production declined because refineries and oil fields were and continue to be capped, not because supply has peaked. I don't notice a decline because there is none.
Why not? "'THE END OF THE OIL AGE is in sight,' says U.S. petroleum geologist M. King Hubbert.... If present trends continue, Dr. Hubbert estimates, production will peak in 1995 -- the deadline for alternative forms of energy that must replace petroleum in the sharp drop-off that follows." from "Oil, the Dwindling Treasure," National Geographic [June, 1974]
No. The prediction was for 1995. Then 2006. What are you gonna say when it doesn't happen in 2010?
Sure. This is merely ONE instance. I could dig up articles all day long... "And its newly discovered offshore fields of oil and natural gas may turn out to be bigger than those in the North Sea in the 1960s." http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/opinion/360251_brazilonline24.html
So says you and a debunked dead scientist with huge conflicts of interests....
Hubbert predicted exactly nothing... |
![]() |
|
| Denial Stops Here: 9/11 To Peak Oil And Beyond · 9/11 Video Research Archive | |




5:14 PM Dec 2