| Viewing Single Post From: Was "Flight 11" a smaller plane? | |
|---|---|
| look-up | Apr 2 2008, 02:05 PM |
|
nope. I don't have a good knowledge of everything that eyewitnesses said like some of you guys do. I'll concede that. I guess the naudet footage is all we have of that hit, and the dude didn't zoom in quick enough to really tell one way or another. hey I'm not going to tell you what to believe. i don't see why a larger plane would set off more alarms... say from ATC or military. I also remember that some evidence was found at the wtc sites that verified it was a large boeing, or am I mistaken about that? additionally, no one really disputes that the plane seen on the 2nd strike footage is a 767, do they? I mean, except for people that think there was no plane at all. So if that one was a 767, I'd say it's almost ridiculous to think the other one was any different. But I'll concede that it certainly COULD have been a smaller plane, although I don't agree that there's any strategic reason to use a smaller plane, or that a missile was needed to help penetrate. I'm filing this information under the part of my brain that houses the "hmm... interesting, but no way to prove one way or another" information. At least until someone uncovers something a little more concrete. Think about it, the plane was only in the naudet bros. field of vision for less than a second, and we are having a hard time identifying the plane with that footage. So how likely is it that someone standing closer, would have heard it, "looked up" and identified it prior to the impact? That is CORRECTLY identify it. I'm not accusing anyone of lying. Just accusing them of using their knowledge of the way air-traffic usually travels, to form their immediate responses to the situation. I can only say what I might have thought if this happened to me. I can't say what the witnesses think or feel. If it were me, I'd assume it was a smaller plane with an inexperienced pilot, who got lost or confused and smashed into a building. I'd imagine that the 767s that usually travel through there, take a much safer route around manhattan than the smaller cessnas and learjets... Again, I'm not saying you're wrong. Just that it doesn't sound likely to be true, in my opinion. peace, |
![]() |
|
| Was "Flight 11" a smaller plane? · American Flight 11 | |




4:48 AM Nov 27