| Viewing Single Post From: Was "Flight 11" a smaller plane? | |
|---|---|
| look-up | Apr 2 2008, 10:16 AM |
|
if they used a missile in one, they would have certainly used one in the second, and knowing that people would already be gathered with dozens of cameras and hundreds of witnesses, they did not use a missile with the second, and it is very difficult to believe they did in the first, in my opinion. the screenshots are so pixellated (not your fault, that's just how it goes sometimes) to tell 100% either way. I do not see any reason why they would need a missile. the plane penetrates just fin on its own. I tend to believe that people only got a very brief glimpse of the first craft, and made mistakes identifying it. I also tend to believe that, no matter what plane was used, the first instinct of every witness would be "accident", not "attack". None of us were really thinking attack until the second one struck. I was getting ready for work when NBC announced a plane had hit the tower. When I got to work, I told everyone there about it. Then, when people turned on the radio and heard a second one hit, we all collectively had our stomaches sink to our shoes, and said, "holy shit. what's going on?" I know none of these points are really "evidence" so to speak, but they are reasonable arguments. |
 |
|
| Was "Flight 11" a smaller plane? · American Flight 11 | |
4:44 AM Dec 6
