Viewing Single Post From: Two Boeing 767-200 KC767TT airborne refueling

Viewing Single Post From: Two Boeing 767-200 KC767TT airborne refueling
SPreston	Mar 10 2008, 11:24 PM
Patriotic American Posts: 1,229 Group: Members Member #122 Joined: 01/18/08	Robert Rice Mar 7 2008, 10:23 PM Check out this thread, entirely corroborative of that finding South Tower Plane Was A Military Drone Aircraft http://letsrollforums.com/south-tower-plane-military-t16911.html Why people in the truth movement flat out reject the drone plane evidence, is beyond me.. Perhaps they misunderstand the word. Drone doesn't always mean remote pilotless. It sometimes means remotely controlled and sometimes means pilotless drone. Hence, it's piloted, but the pilot just isn't in the plane. Another military term used is NULLO (not under live, local operator). A pilotless drone (through extension of the definition) would be a UAV that is autonomous (existing or capable of existing independently). So, the Predator would be a remote piloted drone, and the Global Hawk would be a pilotless drone. Those KC767TT tankers used on the WTC Towers were remotely piloted. No people inside the aircraft sacrificed their lives. They were remotely piloted into WTC1 and WTC2 and the 15000 gals of refueling Jet-A plus its own tanks of 6000 to 10000 gals of Jet-A blew up mostly outside the Towers for the Hollywood special effects. It was purely for the Shock & Awe effect and to cover the use of demolition to explode the WTC Towers from the top down. Footage of Boeing KC-767 Advanced Tanker in Action - - KC-767 Tanker/Transport - - Boeing KC-767 Tanker Offloads Fuel to F-15E KC767TT fuels B-52 SPreston OmegaPoint Blast wave, is the only possible explanation. Who cares precisely the how and the what. There was a blast wave, a demolition wave, and therefore, the buildings were intentionally imploded, or in this case, exploded, the first top down explosive demolition of a high rise steel building, with the explanation everyone is supposed to believe, that they simply "collapsed". They were quite obviously taken down on purpose, and the plane strikes and fires were not the actual cause, only the broad daylight "slight of hand" ruse, to create a suspension of disbelief as to the cause of their total destruciton, in the horrified minds-eye of the observing world. That's all that matters. That it was a ruse, the official story about it, a flat out lie. Does it matter the precise mechanism and explanation other than THEY BLEW THEM UP? I don't think so. We've done our job. The sceptics and debunkers, they would like to drag it in that direction, with questions like - when did they wire the buildings for demolition? How many bombs were there? Was it on every floor, or every tenth floor? <said with a shrill wine> Well, even if every tenth floor, with zero resistence, given the laws of motion, it would still have taken over 30 seconds. The only possible way they could have come down that fast, is by a blast wave, removing all structural integrity BENEATH the falling debris plume/fountain of building material. Period. That's the only thing that needs to be proven unequivocally and has been proven, and it does not matter where those graphs came from, as they depict the truth and the reality in a very easy to understand, straightforward manner. http://letsrollforums.com/number-one-smoking-gun-t16540.html Fascinating research. That is exactly what it looks like on the videos.


Two Boeing 767-200 KC767TT airborne refueling · United Flight 175