| Viewing Single Post From: The Mossad and the Truck Bombs of 9/11 | |
|---|---|
| Domenick DiMaggio | Mar 2 2008, 11:02 AM |
|
Here's the evidence : Exhibit A : NYC Emergency Channel 30 Audio 1) White Van with mural painted on it depicting attacks 2) 2 Occupants flee the vehicle and are arrested 3) Multiple confirmation that the van exploded Exhibit B : Feb 2006 Norman Y. Mineta International Institute for Surface Transportation Policy Studies (MTI) Report 1) White van with mural painted on it depicting attacks 2) 2 Occupants flee the vehicle and are arrested 3) No mention of explosion claims van "innocent delivery truck" 4) Claims occupants "Middle Eastern" and the van was rented Exhibit B which authenticity no one doubts proves Exhibit A to be authentic. Exhibit A is an authentic recording of NYPD on the morning of 9/11/2001. In their uncensored report (i.e. the evidence that exhibit B draws its conclusions from) they state multiple times that the van exploded. The Bush Administration has been proven to have intervened in the EPA report and had them rewrite it to lie to the American people and tell them the air quality at Ground Zero was safe. The Bush Administration has been proven to have greatly influenced the 9/11 Commission with the recent discoveries that Zelikow was in constant contact during the entire investigation with Rove & Rice and at one point Zelikow even tried to pass through a draft which included laying blame with Saddam Hussein. So it has been proven twice that the Bush Administration altered 2 of the most important investigation to the American people and the rest of world, you can say all of mankind in fact. So now having heard the authenticated NYPD recording, having it corroborated all the way up until the ending by the MTI, it is very safe to say the Bush Administration had the MTI report rewritten to fit their version of history. But here are the questions raised that MTI should have addressed : Doesn’t the MTI find it interesting that middle eastern men rented a truck and painted it with a mural depicting an attack currently taking place blocks away? Why would someone paint a mural of WTC being attacked by planes on a rented van? In addition if this was an "innocent delivery truck" why did the suspects attempt to run away? Is this alone not suspicious enough to warrant a full explanation in the MTI report? What happened to these two men? Why was the apparent explosion of the vehicle never reported? And why was first responder audio stating the vehicle had exploded subsequently ignored by all the official investigations into 9/11? |
 |
|
| The Mossad and the Truck Bombs of 9/11 · Israeli/Mossad 9/11 Involvement | |
6:35 AM Nov 28
