| Viewing Single Post From: Poles & Bases: 9/11 vs. non-911 | |
|---|---|
| look-up | Feb 26 2008, 04:43 PM |
|
first of all, it is not MY evidence, and secondly, it does not only show what happens why a car hits it. It shows that the walls of the base, if acted upon by a large enough force, would fail long before that force could be extended to the bolts. it shows that the bolts, for lack of a better term, WILL NOT FAIL, PERIOD. It shows that the base of the pole is DESIGNED TO FAIL, to absorb more of the force of the impact, and to do less damage to the object impacting it. The only difference between the car and the airplane would be the area of the pole impacted. As illustrated, if hit near the top portion of the pole, the base would feel this impact before the bolts, and because they are weaker, would fail before the bolts failed, thus leaving damage not consistent with the available photos of the poles. You're wasting your time trying to skew the information in your favor. |
 |
|
| Poles & Bases: 9/11 vs. non-911 · Pentagon | |
2:24 PM Nov 30
