Viewing Single Post From: Poles & Bases: 9/11 vs. non-911

Viewing Single Post From: Poles & Bases: 9/11 vs. non-911
look-up	Feb 26 2008, 02:57 PM
Posts: 1,642 Group: Admins Member #63 Joined: 01/15/08	sevon Feb 26 2008, 02:42 PM look-up Feb 26 2008, 02:34 PM no sevon, the data shows that it is not consistent with a car hitting it Agreed. look up AND shows that it is not consistent with anything resembling a plane hitting it either. ? Of the data presented, were there any photos presented of light poles hit by "anything resembling a plane?" no but the data shows that the base would not perform in the manner that the available photos claim it did. for instance, that the bolts would not fail, but the walls of the base would fail. The only way for the base to be sheered off in the manner that is implied by the photos, is if was lifted off the ground exactly vertically, which absolutely no one claims. If the force was applied at an angle, which is what IS CLAIMED, then it would have compressed the leading side of the base. Since it did not, it was not hit at an angle, and since the plane would have done this if one was present, then a plane, present in the alleged flight path, did not cause the damage of the light pole. In otherwords, 9/11 is a huge cover-up, as if there wasn't already 1,000 other examples of this that you undoubtedly fully comprehend, yet attempt to ignore or disregard.
Posts: 1,642 Group: Admins Member #63 Joined: 01/15/08

Poles & Bases: 9/11 vs. non-911 · Pentagon