| Viewing Single Post From: Poles & Bases: 9/11 vs. non-911 | |
|---|---|
| Bitterman | Feb 26 2008, 01:51 PM |
|
"Why would it damage the hood if that's not what it hit?" Precisely. "Also, though the OP analysis is interesting, it's not very accurate to compare a pole broken by a car to one hit by a 530mph airplane. When you change that many variables, you're absolutely going to get different results." It's not the same thing, but physics are always in play right? Things like GRAVITY, you may have heard of it. So a pole that gets hit by a car or by a plane is still going to travel in the same direction as dictated by the laws of momentum. A force acts upon an item and it is carried in that direction. So the force can be a car or a plane. It's true the results are random.........but that is the point as well. The pole couldn't have done that small localized damage to a vehicle traveling in the direction it was, and NOT cause some other kind of damage like crushing the hood or putting a severe dent in it. Or if it was fricking swinging wildly as it should have, when it flew through the air, it should have cause other damage to the frame around the cab of the car. Imagine how fast it must have been going!! So when you see differences in poles that have been hit by cars or knocked down some other way than a blow torch, you'll see that the damage to the poles is not consistent with something actually impacting it, you should be able to come to the conclusion that the pole likely didn't behave the way it is shown in pictures. It doesn't add up. Also, the plane flew on the North side so........it DIDN'T hit any poles. That's the most important part. 22205, that was a pretty good post, well done! |
 |
|
| Poles & Bases: 9/11 vs. non-911 · Pentagon | |
8:54 AM Nov 26
