Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Viewing Single Post From: If it was a controlled demolition then . . .
Stundie

Trajan Octavian Titus
Feb 20 2008, 06:14 PM
Stundie
Feb 20 2008, 06:02 PM
sevon
Feb 20 2008, 05:14 PM
I asked you the question and you did not answer it Sevon?? :blink: I'm seeing the kind of dodging that would make one of the worlds best dodgers in the ring Muhammad Ali envious! lol

So please answer.... Yes or No and explain your reasons.


Your question relies on a red herring, you don't understand the NIST report, the NIST does not support the progressive "pancake" collapse scenario.

But regardless you already stated that you don't believe in your own scenario so why don't you answer the original question in the OP instead of trying to shift goal posts and change the topic? Answer: you can't!
I can answer.

I do not know how long it would take...because any answer I or anyone else gives is based on speculation....

We do not know how long, how many men or where they were planted.....

There is no point on arguing on speculation......

Hence the reason I support a new investigation....to find answer to these questions.

Now back to you??
Edited by Stundie, Feb 20 2008, 06:18 PM.
Offline Profile Quote Post
If it was a controlled demolition then . . . · Skeptics