| Viewing Single Post From: If it was a controlled demolition then . . . | |
|---|---|
| Trajan Octavian Titus | Feb 20 2008, 06:14 PM |
|
Your question relies on a red herring and a false premise, you don't understand the NIST report, the NIST does not support the progressive "pancake" collapse scenario, you would not get the effect which brought down the towers through explosives you would need a prolonged heat to bring about the outward bowing of the perimeter columns to get the effect which brought down the towers. You really should do your research. But regardless you already stated that you don't believe in your own scenario so why don't you answer the original question in the OP instead of trying to shift goal posts and change the topic? Answer: you can't! Edited by Trajan Octavian Titus, Feb 20 2008, 06:16 PM.
|
 |
|
| If it was a controlled demolition then . . . · Skeptics | |
I'm seeing the kind of dodging that would make one of the worlds best dodgers in the ring Muhammad Ali envious! lol 
3:37 PM Nov 28
