| Viewing Single Post From: If it was a controlled demolition then . . . | |
|---|---|
| Aldo Marquis CIT | Feb 20 2008, 04:53 PM |
|
Trajan, If a demotilition expert wanted to bring down the towers or a replica of them and he decided to do it using a scenario similar to that of 9/11, what would happen if he planted explosives all throughout the 94th-98th floors out of 110 floors and blew out 4 floors (trusses/perimeter columns), do you think they could make the whole thing collapse or implode downward without stopping??? We are simply talking about swapping the gradual elimination of support (jet fuel fire) for the immediate elimination of support (explosives). If someone asked you to place your bet on whether it would implode downward without stopping or not, which would you choose? Is it likely that it will implode downward without stopping? Or is it likely that it will not? If not, why wouldn't a demolition expert do it this way? |
 |
|
| If it was a controlled demolition then . . . · Skeptics | |
8:04 PM Nov 28
