Viewing Single Post From: If it was a controlled demolition then . . .

Viewing Single Post From: If it was a controlled demolition then . . .
Trajan Octavian Titus	Feb 20 2008, 04:34 PM
Posts: 67 Group: Members Member #335 Joined: 02/19/08	Stundie Feb 20 2008, 04:22 PM sevon Feb 20 2008, 03:50 PM Stundie Feb 20 2008, 12:01 PM So the question is, why would you need to wire the entire building, if you believe that only 6 floors of damage is enough to cause the WTC to collapse? (As in the official story!) Do you agree with that claim? (That 6 floors of damage could cause the collapses witnessed on 9/11?) No....Do you?? O.K. for the sake of argument let's assume that your red herring logical fallacy is correct IE that the buildings did collapse from the impact of the planes alone and the resulting structural damage rather than the totality of all factors involved namely the heat generated by the fires which caused severe bowing of the interior and exterior support columns, well then you're arguing against your own argument then aren't you? You just admitted that you don't believe the aforementioned scenario meaning that it must have taken far more explosives, so now instead of trying to shift the topic and the goal post why don't you answer the original question in the OP? "How did they get the explosives in there without anyone noticing?" Edited by Trajan Octavian Titus, Feb 20 2008, 04:38 PM.
Posts: 67 Group: Members Member #335 Joined: 02/19/08

If it was a controlled demolition then . . . · Skeptics