Viewing Single Post From: If it was a controlled demolition then . . .

Viewing Single Post From: If it was a controlled demolition then . . .
Trajan Octavian Titus	Feb 20 2008, 04:30 PM
Posts: 67 Group: Members Member #335 Joined: 02/19/08	Stundie Feb 20 2008, 12:01 PM Trajan Octavian Titus Feb 19 2008, 09:16 PM How do you explain the following figures? Quote: J.L. Hudson’s in Detroit, Michigan, the tallest building ever razed, was 439 ft. (26 stories) http://www.implosionworld.com/records.htm WTC 7 was 570 ft. (47 stories) 1.3 times the height of the J.L. Hudson. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/7_World_Trade_Center WTC 1/2 was 1,368 ft. (110 stories) 3.12 times the height of J.L. Hudson. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1_World_Trade_Center http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2_World_Trade_Center So, on 9/11, three buildings were razed with perfect precision. One was 131 ft. taller than the record tower and the other two (minus cell phone antennas) were 929 ft. taller than the record holder. The Hudson Building “It took us 24 days with 12 people doing nothing but loading explosives…” James Santoro – Controlled Demolition Incorporated" http://www.history.com/media.do?id=most_hudsons_implosion_broadband&action=clip Now if we extrapolate those figures we can assume that it would have taken 72 days with 12 people just to load the explosives and that's just for one building, but let's say that they used some special type of explosive which was lighter, and they were really motivated to get the job done, and even though the buildings were much larger let's say they had less columns then let's go ahead and cut that figure in half IE 36 days with 12 people to load the explosives now perhaps you can explain to me how this could be done in three of the most secure buildings in the world without anyone noticing or without being captured on video or without the bomb sniffing dogs noticing etc etc? OK...Lets assume that you believe that the official story is true. A plane hit WTC 1 causing sever damage between 93rd and 99th floors and the ensuing fires brought the WTC 1?? Agreed! So the question is, why would you need to wire the entire building, if you believe that only 6 floors of damage is enough to cause the WTC to collapse? (As in the official story!) According to your logic, all that would be needed is enough explosives loaded between floors 93 and 99 to achieve the same results....so this makes your wiring all of WTC a completely mooted point. Do you really think the WTC are according to you "three of the most secure buildings in the world" A) There would be no way of knowing what would have been the tipping point for complete structural failure until after it already happened and most assuredly the conspirators would not have risked the building not collapsing thus being exposed as mass murderers. B) You're argument for the "official version" is a red herring, the building did not collapse due to the structural impact of the airplanes alone it happened because of that impact and the fires which occurred afterward and the heat generated from said fires caused severe bowing of the structural support columns, you would not be able to get that effect from explosives; furthermore, the NIST investigation showed conclusively that the failure of the inwardly bowed perimeter columns initiated collapse and that the occurrence of this inward bowing required the sagging floors to remain connected to the columns and pull the columns inwards. Thus, the floors did not fail progressively to cause a pancaking phenomenon. NIST Report C) Yes following the first 93' WTC bombing the WTC's were some if not the three most secure buildings on the planet. Edited by Trajan Octavian Titus, Feb 20 2008, 04:35 PM.
Posts: 67 Group: Members Member #335 Joined: 02/19/08

If it was a controlled demolition then . . . · Skeptics