Viewing Single Post From: If it was a controlled demolition then . . .

Viewing Single Post From: If it was a controlled demolition then . . .
Trajan Octavian Titus	Feb 19 2008, 09:16 PM
Posts: 67 Group: Members Member #335 Joined: 02/19/08	How do you explain the following figures? Quote: J.L. Hudson’s in Detroit, Michigan, the tallest building ever razed, was 439 ft. (26 stories) http://www.implosionworld.com/records.htm WTC 7 was 570 ft. (47 stories) 1.3 times the height of the J.L. Hudson. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/7_World_Trade_Center WTC 1/2 was 1,368 ft. (110 stories) 3.12 times the height of J.L. Hudson. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1_World_Trade_Center http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2_World_Trade_Center So, on 9/11, three buildings were razed with perfect precision. One was 131 ft. taller than the record tower and the other two (minus cell phone antennas) were 929 ft. taller than the record holder. The Hudson Building “It took us 24 days with 12 people doing nothing but loading explosives…” James Santoro – Controlled Demolition Incorporated" http://www.history.com/media.do?id=most_hudsons_implosion_broadband&action=clip Now if we extrapolate those figures we can assume that it would have taken 72 days with 12 people just to load the explosives and that's just for one building, but let's say that they used some special type of explosive which was lighter, and they were really motivated to get the job done, and even though the buildings were much larger let's say they had less columns then let's go ahead and cut that figure in half IE 36 days with 12 people to load the explosives now perhaps you can explain to me how this could be done in three of the most secure buildings in the world without anyone noticing or without being captured on video or without the bomb sniffing dogs noticing etc etc?
Posts: 67 Group: Members Member #335 Joined: 02/19/08

If it was a controlled demolition then . . . · Skeptics