Viewing Single Post From: Light poll placement question

Viewing Single Post From: Light poll placement question
SPreston	Feb 11 2008, 05:36 PM
Patriotic American Posts: 1,229 Group: Members Member #122 Joined: 01/18/08	look-up Feb 11 2008, 11:29 AM I am also wondering how much of an effect the light poles would have had on the plane's pitch as well. If a plane hit a light pole at a lower speed (thus not acheiving as much lift), I think it would be reasonable, knowing some basic physics, to conclude that the light pole, attached to the road/ground with strong bolts, would pull down on the wing as it impacted. Picture this happening many times to the "plane", and then wonder why the lawn was virtually unscathed. One explanation would be that perhaps the plane was travelling fast enough so that the pitch was not altered as much as it would have been if it was travelling slower. That is possible. I think it is just becoming very clear now that a plane did not impact the pentagon. If one did, it would have had to have a path "cleared" for it beforehand, otherwise it might not impact at the exact location that was needed to both test the bomb-reinforced section's success at repelling a missile, and both keep the rest of the mammoth building from being destroyed, since unlike the WTC, there was no real financial reason to destroy the towers, and many of the people within the building (pentagram) were high level military and their lives were not considered as expendable as the civilians in New York. Excellent points. I have attempted to visualize a 757 flying the official flight path as you suggest, clipping the light poles at 530 mph, impacting the Pentagon wall to slide under the 2nd story floor slab, somehow missing the polyethelene cable spools directly in its path, sliding through the 1st floor rooms and columns and somehow maintaining its kinetic energy throughout this alleged massive destruction, and finally emerging through a reinforced brick wall and through a 9 ft round hole only to entirely disappear in the corridor beyond. I cannot. The entire scenario is just too ridiculous and dependent on faith and not logic and scientific laws of physics to be perceived. The alleged light pole hurler. In this computer simulation video produced by Bush Regime OCT defenders Integrated Consultants Inc, the #1 light pole is knocked straight ahead by the right wing and allegedly into the taxicab windshield. But the taxicab is not located under the aircraft. The taxicab is located north of the aircraft coming south down the roadway at 40-45 mph (or about 66 feet per second) and allegedly took 40' to stop (less than a second? Unlikely. More likely about 100' or about 2-3 seconds to stop since Lincolns were known for poor braking ability-Stopping Distance Calculation) after the light pole allegedly crashed through the windshield into the back seat. To make their dumb propaganda flick work, they have to rewrite the official story. This happens much too often with these Bush Regime apologists. Integrated Consultants Computer Simulation ignoring the official facts 911 Case Study: Pentagon Flight 77 Edited by SPreston, Feb 11 2008, 05:40 PM.


Light poll placement question · Pentagon