Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Viewing Single Post From: Pandora's Black Box Ch. 3 - Flight Of United 93
Killtown
Member Avatar
Childish Hypocrite
Hetware
Feb 10 2008, 07:56 PM
1) I believe Susan was manipulated into making an inaccurate statement about what she saw.

2) but the rest of the evidence, such as the concentration of small pieces of debris in the immediate area suggest that UAL 93 was disintegrated by a warhead fired from an A-10 at pointblank range.

3) The idea that some kind of a small drone made the crater is not consistent with the witness testimony.
1) You mean that the pro-shoot down crowd assumed that she was referring to an A-10 to help distract from no 757 crashing. Go back and look at her original account, SHE NEVER MENTIONS that the aircraft she saw HAD WINGS. The description she gave of the tail just happened to be a similar description of an A-10 and you guys took that and ran with it as you just showed:

Quote:
 
I came to the conclusion on my own by reading and listening to her account and the accounts of others.



In person, Terrorcell showed her a photo of an A-10 and asked her if that's what she saw. She emphatically said "NO".

2) Wow, I've never heard of missile that would fit on an A-10 being able to virtually obliterate a 100-ton 757. What kind do you think could have done that? And where are the witnesses who saw the MASSIVE explosion that MUST have happened if a warhead obliterated Flight 93?

3) I don't think a drone caused it either. I showed how that engine scrap in the crater was planted here.
Offline Profile Quote Post
Pandora's Black Box Ch. 3 - Flight Of United 93 · 9/11 Video Research Archive