| Viewing Single Post From: Police stopped traffic before the plane hit | |
|---|---|
| SPreston | Feb 8 2008, 01:19 AM |
Patriotic American
|
officially the aircraft was flying 1 ft 11 in off the ground Yes it is embarrassing. That so many people on this board, and several other boards, who have claimed to study this Pentagon attack in detail, would continue to believe this silly fantasy, is even more embarrassing. As behind points out, the absurdity is how low the aircraft was in the official story. With their obviously altered 'security videos', they screwed themselves by forcing the alleged 757 aircraft to descend a steep hill and pull up in an impossible manuever in order to attain the flight trajectory seen in their manufactured videos. Here in their Pentagon Building Performance Report, they nailed the lid on their own coffin by officially stating the aircraft's height above the ground and the distance from the Pentagon west wall. When viewed with an open mind, their official Flight 77 trajectory became impossible. This official document was produced by the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) and the Structural Engineering Institute (SEI). This report is the OCT of the Pentagon attack.
 The 757-200 fuselage is oval with a width of 12 ft 4 in and height of 13 ft 2 in. The bottom of the engine cowlings are 4 ft 11 in lower. So officially the aircraft was flying 1 ft 11 in off the ground (engine cowlings to ground) when it entered the first photo of the series and was 320 ft from the west wall of the Pentagon. The belly tank hangs about 1 ft 11 in below the fuselage.
first photograph of this series   However to enter the 1st floor of the Pentagon, the aircraft needed to fly even lower in order to slide under the 2nd story floor slab which is about 13 ft above ground level. The overall aircraft height would have been 18 ft 1 in from top of fuselage to bottom of engine cowlings if they were an inch above ground level. There is no evidence any engines or anything else struck the lawn at any time. Thus the fuselage top was 5 ft 1 in too high to slide under the 2nd story floor slab. Officially the aircraft entered the 1st floor under the 2nd story floor slab and penetrated through the 1st floor rings to exit out the C-Ring wall at the Exit Hole. To make matters worse, there were polyethelene cable spools directly in the path of the fuselage and belly tank with a height of 6 ft 6 in and 5 ft 5 in which could not fit under the belly tank. These cable spools were not destroyed nor damaged nor melted.  It is highly unlikely that a 757 diving down the steep 120 ft hill from the Navy Annex at 530 mph would have been able to pull up in order to accomplish the level flight path across the Pentagon lawn 1 ft 11 in above it. The aircraft could not have fit between the 2nd story floor slab and the cable spools. Of course the cable spools were not melted in the phony looking white-hot initial explosion shown in the official security videos, even though they were supposedly surrounded by the exploding jet fuel. Jet fuel does not burn white-hot. That is impossible. Jet fuel burns red/yellow/orange. White-hot is much hotter. There were no shadows in the foreground from the supposedly very bright explosion. Even though the security videos are official, they are very poor fakes. Therefore for multiple reasons, it is impossible for a 757 to have impacted the Pentagon as the official fantasy tells it. It is embarrassing that anyone would be foolish enough to believe it.    Arrogant Deception - Or an Attempt to Expose a Cover-up? 
Edited by SPreston, Feb 8 2008, 01:58 AM.
|
 |
|
| Police stopped traffic before the plane hit · Pentagon | |
12:09 AM Nov 30
