| Viewing Single Post From: Police stopped traffic before the plane hit | |
|---|---|
| behind | Feb 7 2008, 09:24 PM |
|
It is imo one of the most absurd part of the official story how low the "plane" allegedly was. Official story: "3.3 SECURITY CAMERA PHOTOGRAPHSA: Pentagon security camera located near the northwest corner of the building recorded the aircraft as it approached the building. Five photo-graphs (figures 3.3 through 3.7),taken approximately one second apart,show the approaching aircraft and the ensuing fireball associated with the initial impact.The first photograph (figure 3.3) captured an image ofthe aircraft when it was approximately 320 ft (approximately 0.42 sec-ond) from impact with the west wall of the Pentagon.Two photographs(figures 3.3 and 3.7),when compared,seem to show that the top of thefuselage of the aircraft was no more than approximately 20 ft above the ground when the first photograph of this series was taken" B757 Body Exterior Width is 12 ft 4 in and the if we say that the enginees are about three feet lower than the body we are talking about 5 feet above the ground  "3.7 SUMMARY OF THE IMPACT: The Boeing 757 approached the west wall of the Pentagon from the southwest at approximately 780 ft/s.As it approached the Pentagon site it was so low to the ground that it reportedly clipped anantenna on a vehicle on an adjacent road and severed light posts.When it was approximately 320 ft from the west wall of the build-ing (0.42 second before impact), it was flying nearly level, only a few feet above the ground" Pentagon Building Performance Report I mean ... it is so stupit that it is really embarrising. (But I am from Europe and here it is not as emotional issue as in US and I ofcource understand that, it happened in your country, I am looking at it from a distance) Edited by behind, Feb 7 2008, 09:57 PM.
|
 |
|
| Police stopped traffic before the plane hit · Pentagon | |
4:40 AM Nov 30
