| Viewing Single Post From: A statement. | |
|---|---|
| Douglas Hilton | Aug 18 2009, 11:50 AM |
|
hi to beat prophet- hi from UK ! (any newbies- btw, NPT means No Planes Theory) to my mind the definitive argument against NPT was photos by a construction worker called scaffoldrider (think i got the name right) which are of plane parts which were scattered over building roof top / ledges on a building adjacent to twin towers the parts have yellow stencilled identifying codes/numbers on them i appreciate your confusion as before i saw the photos i too had heard more fuss over NPT / anti NPT than i had seen evidence one way or the other so i was glad to find evidence for me that drew a line under the subject and i'm not now considering NPT as i think NPT is not valid (btw i was pretty sure it was not valid anyway but wanted closure) i think we should all learn little by little and consider all options and cross off possibilities as we go along i hope this is OK with people from both sides of the NPT debate also remember there is a constant stream of people new to all this research so we can gently bring them up to speed i found the photos during the process of registering for 911blogger this was because they are strict against NPT and say so and present the photos as evidence anyway- good i got to see the photos i strongly suggest registering to join 911blogger as you can see the photos in the rules section of registration and join a great site too ! i hope i have been of help ! btw someone let me know when 911blogger is back up pls dont3fan@gmail.com thx |
 |
|
| A statement. · The Lounge | |
6:41 AM Nov 30
