| Viewing Single Post From: Positive ID on "Harley Davidson Guy"? | |
|---|---|
| 22205 | Aug 3 2009, 05:34 PM |
Arlingtonian
|
http://tinyurl.com/krhgm7
thats weird, because i have seen dom on the ksa's shitlist, with his name and address posted and all.
none of cit and its "cohorts" are going out of their way to discredit you, for you have mostly accomplished that all by yourself with your lsd-induced observations of visual phenomenon and your crappy (people's court/ 911 witness) "research". but just for you ozzy - and for me to get to the bottom of it all - i contacted craig and asked for info about that the true source of that jimmy fallon picture that seemed to cause such a ruckus, and he in turn contacted that source for more detailed info. so from what i understand, the person who forwarded it to him, was so enthralled (and convinced) by YOUR mark humphrey "discovery" that they began emailing it around trying to help promote it. so this person was on your side ozzy, not against you. but this person (in their zeal and eagerness of the moment) decided to bolster your "evidence" and did their own googling of "mark humphrey" and added some pictures to it. unfortunately however, this person did NOT do a good job of vetting the information, and erroneously included jimmy fallon in their email. that email ended up in craig's inbox, and initially he even posted a thread at his forum to help disseminate/promote it. that thread was mostly comprised of the "research" you put together, but also included the fallon picture. i saw the thread there, and at the time had seen how you had been suddenly unregistered at kt's forum. from reading around over there (at kt's) i guessed at the time that the real and actual mark humphrey had something to do with your forced unregistering, and figured that maybe humphrey was on a legal crusade to rid the internet of the libel against him. i communicated that risk/liability to aldo, and (without craig's input or approval) he decided with my input/approval that we would be better off (im an admin at that site as well) without the mark humphrey thread, so it was erased. i was also concerned that we would be inviting the fakery/noplanes element to our forum, a place where we have tried hard to seperate ourselves from being confused or grouped with "no planes". so there you have it neil, the whole story. craig was in favor of your theory and was even willing to post it at his own forum - so he is not your enemy. there was/is no cit conspiracy against you, just a simple error by someone who was looking to support and disseminate your "theory". weezula on the other hand, none of us (aldo craig or me) know him/her and we have no idea what his/her agenda is. he/she made the video that made a big deal of the fallon thing, so only he/she can answer for that. but weezula is not a cit member (not even a member at our forum), so we are not associated with his/her actions. granted, in this thread i was the one who exposed the pic as being of fallon, and i erroneously and without official proof attributed that to you - and for that i apologize and have since tried to clear the record so that no misinformation continues to linger and so that no bad blood exists between us (u and me). as far as your banishment, perhaps that can be chalked up to your negative reputation as a harasser/stalker, honestly i dont know - so the mods/admins here may be able to answer for that (if they so please). but it was not my intention to misrepresent you or your theory, even though i whole heartedly disagree with its validity, nor was it my intention to have you banned here. *** in closing oz i'd like to say that we (cit) have worked tirelessly to get to some real tangible and actual 9/11 truth. aldo and craig did it on their own at first, and then i - after much observation and studying of all the facts/questions and the people ( actual witnesses as well as the "truthers"), joined them. i scrutinized everything, and decided who i thought was doing the most honest and sincere work in trying to expose what happened here in arlington that day. with full confidence i have put all my eggs in their basket (so to speak) and have no regrets. they are not agents and have not been compromised or leveraged. they are the closest thing to a "truther" you are ever gonna find. no one else in this movement has dug up and contacted witnesses like they/we have. so while you may think your mark humphrey discovery is big shit, its nothing compared to what we have done. to waste our time trying to muddy the humphrey waters would be an effort much better suited for people dicking around with peripheral truths and trivial pursuits*. our mission is real truth and i dont give a fuck what ridiculous visual perpsective changes (due to movement of camera/filming location) that psymon shack and d.duk come up with as evidence for pentagon "tv fakery", the real fakery at the pentagon included a plane and no video fakery - just video absence. duh. if they could convincingly fake a video of a plane crash, well they sure as shit would have faked one crashing into the pentagon by now. given the npt wtc logic - it would have been simple considering an actual plane flew within feet of the place... but they haveNt faked it, cuz they caNt. * finding the harley guy is a mission well worth pursuing. but comparing pics of him to an established tv/movie actor, is not the path to successfully identifying and exposing the operative who was the "harley guy". please spend your time and efforts seeping through the hours of footage and see if you can spot him somewhere, like in a tactical swat uniform or something. or find some other means of getting to the bottom of it, like maybe finding one of those people who were standing around him in the footage. maybe one of them noticed something shady about him that day and would like to share it. something man, for chrissakes, something real. pics and comparisons are not gonna cut it. best wishes. |
 |
|
| Positive ID on "Harley Davidson Guy"? · The Lounge | |
7:54 PM Dec 5
