| Viewing Single Post From: Shanksville Chapter extra | |
|---|---|
| RKOwens4 | Feb 3 2008, 09:45 PM |
|
You claim the ABC report contradicts the commission, saying that "they were clearly talking about a SHOOTDOWN ORDER, not an intercept order." Again, have you watched your own video clip as presented in Loose Change? The report, word for word, says, 'Marr orders his air controllers, "TELL THE PILOTS to intercept Flight 93.'" Where are you seeing the word shoot-down anywhere in this sentence, or anywhere in the report for that matter??? Like I've said, an intercept order is entirely different than a shoot-down order. The fighters WERE ordered to intercept Flight 93. But the shoot-down order WAS NOT given to them. If there's more to the report than was presented in Loose Change, please send me a link. But the report you've presented, word for word, proves that an INTERCEPT ORDER was given, not a shoot-down order. Once again, No, Marr did not give a shoot-down order to the pilots. The anchor talks about telling the pilots to intercept United 93, and then Marr talks about "that order". That order. The intercept order. Nowhere does a shoot-down order even come up. You, my friend, have twisted the words of the military commanders and others on 9/11 and then, baselessly, accused them (either directly or indirectly) of shooting down Flight 93. And on top of that, you've presented this baseless claim grounded on misquotations to likely tens of millions of viewers as "the truth". Are you proud of that? I've shown that not a single one of these reports contradicts the 9/11 Commission. If I'm wrong, then tell me where. Specifically where anyone mentions a shoot-down order as opposed to an intercept order or where anyone says that the events they refer to took place before 10:03. The burden of proof is on you. You've misled millions and denied the heroic actions of the passengers of United 93 without a single shred of proof. Aside from having no supporting proof, the evidence that does exist directly disproves any possibility of United 93 being shot-down. If the plane were hit by a missile, it would have shed debris (and likely at least one of its engines) north-west along its flight path. However, not a single piece of debris was found along the plane's flight path prior to the crater. (If you want to refer to the debris being found eight miles away, remember that this was lightweight insulation found in exactly the direction the wind was blowing, and south-east of the crater, in an area the plane never flew over.) Edited by RKOwens4, Feb 3 2008, 09:55 PM.
|
 |
|
| Shanksville Chapter extra · Loose Change 9/11: An American Coup | |
7:16 AM Dec 4
