| Viewing Single Post From: Police stopped traffic before the plane hit | |
|---|---|
| Domenick DiMaggio | Jan 31 2008, 01:50 PM |
|
You're correct. Unless you're in denial like "skeptics" and the pro-impact crowd. I had quite the argument about this because I said the poles would have caused fatal damage to the wings and the plane would have crashed/skidded into the building as compared to flying level 5' off the ground as the allegedly authentic 5 frames indicates. Some people think birds are composed of stronger materials and say that the poles are "break away" poles which means they're meant to give during an impact. Even so, they are breakaway at the bottoms, not at the top where the plane would have been clipping them. And even if a car impacts a "break away" pole the pole is still going to cause significant damage to the vehicle. You are still hitting an object. You hit a deer or a dog it causes damage and they're not cemented into the ground.... The plane is alleged to have done this 5 times and remain intact and controllable. Also the turbulance wake is alleged to have had no effect what so ever on any of the vehicles. Some of the witnesses referenced by the pro-impact crowd state they also saw the plane clipping antenna's of vehicles during it's approach because it was flying so low. Can you imagine what the blast from a 757 doing 500MPH inches above your head would do to the vehicle you are sitting in? |
 |
|
| Police stopped traffic before the plane hit · Pentagon | |
7:37 AM Nov 28
