| Viewing Single Post From: We Never Went to the Moon | |
|---|---|
| David C | Jul 4 2009, 02:46 PM |
|
Here's the thread being discussed. http://apollohoax.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=theories&action=display&thread=1009&page=1 This is from post #8
They considered the fact that there was no dust billowing to be proof that the footage was taken in a vacuum. I pointed out that it was possible to treat sand to make it dust-free. They then said that just transporting and placing dust-free sand would cause enough erosion to create enough dust to cause a dust-cloud when the sand is driven over. Jay Windley and a few others said they knew this from experience. This is simply not true. I knew it wasn't true immediately. I told two people with backgrounds in geology what Jay Windley said. One of them laughed out loud. This is a pretty basic fact. Also, I didn't say Jay Windley didn't have experience in particulates. I said he was lying when he said that he knew from experience that just transporting and placing dust-free sand would cause enough erosion to create enough dust to cause a dust cloud when the sand is driven over. You're having a hard time obfuscating this one.
There are a lot of different ways to say someone's response is lame. It can be said that this response is so lame that it would get him laughed out of the debating hall. It can be said that the response is so lame that no intelligent person would be impressed by it. The way HeadLikeARock is responding to my requests that he give straight answers to my questions is just plain lame. I'm really glad he's here because, as the representitive from the Clavius forum, he's making it very clear how full of BS the Clavius forum is. http://apollohoax.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=viewprofile&user=postbaguk http://apollohoax.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=theories&action=display&thread=1107&page=1#33457
You're ignoring the evidence I posted. He lied when he said that he knew from experience that just transporting and placing dust-free sand would cause enough erosion to create enough dust to cause a dust-cloud when the sand is driven over. He also refused to answer a direct question put to him here in reply #3. http://apollohoax.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=othertheories&action=display&thread=1584
I'm aware of this but on moon hoax threads this forum is generally referred to as the Clavius forum. If I don't call it that, a few people might not know what I'm referring to. This is a trivial point.
It's just a straightforward question. They are obviously trying to obfuscate the evidence. You people can't seem to deal with the issue so you're trying to tap dance around it and bury it.
We have to wait till we see this before we can have a serious discussion about it but with the technology available today, this footage is probably fakable. Anything that's fakable isn't conclusive proof. It also won't make all the crushing hoax evidence go away. Here's something else. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XCTU1eLTYWM He looks like he's lying to me. This is mere circumstantial evidence but all the circumstantial evidence seems to go in the same direction. There's a good collection of Apollo hoax videos here. http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=straydog02&view=favorites I've only looked at a few of them. That's where I found the above one. Be sure to check out the comment sections. None of the people whom I asked to address this in post #862 have responded so here it is again.
I'm waiting. |
 |
|
| We Never Went to the Moon · Skeptics | |
10:14 AM Nov 28
